215
Ohio Republicans make plans after voters approve Issue 1, Issue 2
(www.dispatch.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
215 points (98.2% liked)
politics
18073 readers
3160 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Interesting how "people disagree with me" never even enters their fucking consciousness. These people won't give up until they die and someone else takes over. May that day come sooner than later.
I think it's important to understand that to many of these people, it's deeply religious. They believe that they are doing God's work, and if they compromise on issues they believe are facilitated in scripture, they might end up in hell. So they choose martyrdom over cooperation. They'll gladly sacrifice democracy if they feel like democracy is going against their interpretation of God's word.
It's the same reason peace in the Middle East is so difficult and seemingly unattainable. No one budges on their religion.
The wild thing is that scripture supports abortion and even demands it in some cases. These people don't know their own scripture and they don't care about scripture... they care about what the loud, dramatic white man told them on stage last Sunday. Nothing more, nothing less.
That's why I specifically said "their interpretation" of scripture. It doesn't really matter how other people interpret scripture. Politics among evangelical Christians is very much a "my way or the highway" kind of ideology.
Someone should remind them of separation of Church and State. If the US was supposed to be controlled by these peoples religious views the founding fathers would have put the Church in charge. I feel like we need some new legislation against these religious extremists from being eligible to run for an office if they can't follow the rules. The second they go off on a "God wants..." tangent we should say "thank you for your service, you are relieved of duty" and we have another election.
So many dogwhistles in that screed. "abortion industry","Wealthy", "out-of-state", "special interests", "radical", "abortion on demand".
I agree with them that babies' lives are worth fighting for. The problem is, I don't agree that a fetus is a baby. Alive? Sure, insomuch as a parasite is alive or cancer is alive. That we often colloquially call a fetus a baby doesn't magically make it one.
These people don't want to protect babies. Let's be clear about that. If they did, snap benefits would be expanded to all children.
Abortion is about control and punishing women. When you get away from the rhetoric, it comes down to slut shaming women for having sex.
They don't actually care if babies are saved. They only care that women are punished.
And schools would have effective sex education. And birth control would be free or subsidized by the States.
But I totally agree. "Children" are only a tool to scare well-meaning people into thinking there's a problem where there is none.
I understand how they think that way. Most Ohioans just support abortion but don’t shout it. And there’s a ton of people shouting opposition
The world would be a whole lot better if conservatives learned that not everyone has to make their ideology their identity.