politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Like nearly every single "both sides" argument in all of online history, this one fulfills one of these two roles:
You'll nearly never see a "both sides" argument in the wild that does one of these things:
You may draw your own conclusions from that, gentle reader.
Edit: Removed the hyperbole.
Pardon me, but I'm going to steal this from you wholesale. This is too good to not re-use.
I'm flattered, thanks!
Clever, and not invalid. But it also ignores the point I was making.
I'm NOT trying to minimize the shitty things GOP has done recently. The Karl Rove strategy of pandering to religious social conservatives has caused more pain for this country than can be put into words. Just like McCain legitimizing Sarah Palin (although he redeemed himself with Obamacare), legitimizing the 'Evangelical' political position is damn near unforgiveable. And as a single strategy that has done more to tear our country apart than anything DNC's done. So please don't think I'm excusing the GOP's sins.
What I AM saying, is that whatever their sins may be, they don't always get it wrong all the time. Nobody does. Democrats don't always get it right all the time. Nobody does.
And thus it's dangerous for anyone (on either side) to fall into the logical trap of 'I'm a good person, a smart person, I've decided this is right. Therefore, everyone who thinks it's wrong must be a dumb person or a bad person'.
I believe every American should judge each argument on its own merits, regardless of its source. And if the result is always that blue is right and red is wrong, so be it-- but that should NEVER lead to complacency where blue is always assumed to be right and red is always assumed to be wrong (or vice versa) with analysis or debate deemed unnecessary.
That is a VERY dangerous slippery slope that has, historically, led to some very dark places.
I definitely don't think blue is always right. Been a long time since I've seen them be less wrong than red though. And, I've seen what they do when we let them have power these days.
I will vote against red at every level, from local on up, because they have shown me (and all of us) who they are. I believe Republicans in power are a worse thing for this country than any likely negative impact from voting blue.
In the meantime, I'll hope that blue become better at living up to something more than just not being red.
Maybe R will reform themselves enough to be trusted with adult things before I die of old age. I'm not holding my breath.
Regardless, I appreciate your nuanced rebuttal, and can see that your aim was not as it appeared to me. However, I like to remind folks at every opportunity that influencers in online discussions who do "both sides" an argument are never doing it to promote balance, even though they always try to frame it that way. They are doing it to help one particular side.
For that reason, I still stand by the comment, am glad it was well received by others, and hope it will shape how they evaluate that sort of argument when it comes up.