this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
236 points (90.7% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3079 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 85 points 11 months ago (4 children)

What, the usual GOP modus operandi of "Launder Russian money by buying a shitload of these books to force them onto best-seller lists and then give them away at our klan rallies" isn't happening now?

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

She may be dumb enough to think people were actually buying those books.

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If only her supporters could read 😔

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

If her supporters could read, they wouldn't support her.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Inb4 she's next year's new RINO.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why rhino next year when you can horse this year?

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Horse? Why are we bringing Sarah Jessica Parker into this?

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

I've never agreed with that sentiment.

[–] brothershamus@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Man web search is getting really bad. I can't find where that happened and normally it would be pretty easy. Was that a Bush II-era thing or was that a Trump thing?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It's a standard way to funnel campaign donations into your personal bank account. You negotiate a big percentage of each book sell with the publisher or self publish, have a ghost writer whip out a book, then use campaign money to buy the books to hand out at rallies.

So you get a 30% cut of each sale and you buy 1mil of books with politcal donations, boom! You just got 300k, and you profit from any rube actually buying the book out in the world.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

And you hit the “best sellers” lists for first week sales too.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Same for search. If I'm trying to search for something that happened in the past and that person or subject has been in the news recently, that's ALL I get. even using +/- and "" modifiers does nothing and gives me results without my specific search functions.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I have heard other users say that Google ignores those modifiers now, but I hadn't seen anything from an official publication saying so. But it makes sense when you think about it- the faster you get your search results, the less time you spend looking at ads.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

She's pissed off a lot of people in the party so they aren't helping her the way they would someone like Graham.