this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
857 points (97.6% liked)

News

23296 readers
3757 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iBaz@lemmy.world 104 points 11 months ago (12 children)

What can he do about it? We live in a free market society. All he can do is keep talking about it and hope the people get the message. Rebellion will start at the consumer level and go up, not the other way around. Main problem is the millions of people that rely on Fox for their news.

[–] WeeSheep@lemmy.world 154 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Use the anti monopoly laws we have in place to prevent price gouging from lack of competition

[–] protist@mander.xyz 139 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

He issued an executive order in 2021 to do just that, among many other things to promote competition. There has definitely been an uptick in antitrust cases since then, and inflation has also decreased significantly.

https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-case-filings

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 42 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Sorry to be pedantic on the internet (lol) but it might be more accurate to say inflation has slowed.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Up like a rocket down like a parachute.

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Except the unfortunate part is that it is always increasing, it's just a derivative, rate of change. But the massive boost from months of heavy inflation is now here permanently, so we're adding 2-3% on TOP of the already-inflated costs. But that's not telling the full story, it is the value of the US dollar going down primarily. Buying power is lower by definition, but because of that, everyone on the bottom end is getting squeezed beyond anything they are ready for and it's going to eventually cause civil unrest on a larger scale.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's exactly the point of my analogy. Wtf.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

Parachutes come down, Inflation just goes up slower.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He picked two points in time and described a number that was fixed at each instance, so decreased works fine.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

But it didn't decrease, the rate of increase is what decreased. Inflation is a measure of acceleration, 7% and 3% are both increasing inflation.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If you're accelerating slower, you've decreased your acceleration.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

But you are still moving. The dollar is worth less.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Then the original comment should have been pedantic about the fact that they're clearly talking about the rate of inflation even though they referred to it simply as "inflation". The rest of us got that.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Which would mean it didn't decrease if inflation was a measure of value. But it's not. It's a measure of speed of change in value.

[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 3 points 11 months ago

Inflation is a measure of acceleration

Oh look at that, you accidentally stumbled onto your own answer for why measuring a deceleration counts as a decrease, good for you!

[–] protist@mander.xyz 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Burn the pedant!

I still think decreased is accurate though, the rate of inflation is significantly smaller today vs then, so the rate has decreased

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah if it was deflation that would’ve been a huge deal because our economy is built on an inflationary assumption and deflation would crash it

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The bipartisan PPP (passed under Trump) was insane.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

lets add taxing the shit out of people who do this to the list.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How would you like the President of the United States to do that? Do you think the President is a dictator that can just unilaterally pass sweeping legislation? How do you think the public would react if the President had the power to directly determine the prices of goods? How do you think that would go in general?

[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 6 points 11 months ago

The fact this is even in the negatives a tiny bit really demonstrates the typical political intelligence of your average voter.

You’re of course completely correct, and Biden has indeed done everything he LEGALLY can do, which is probably why we’re suffering far less than a lot of the rest of the developed world economically speaking.

People just like to shout at the wind, it seems.

[–] Deiv@lemmy.ca 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Damn there is nothing the government can do. Sorry guys :( You'll just have to buy less food, and maybe then the corporations will get the hint!

Regulations? Laws against price gauging? Naw, they can't do that. It's the consumers that are at fault!

[–] iBaz@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do you think Biden makes the laws? Did you fail civics class? I said nothing about enacting laws making what these companies are doing illegal, I only said Biden can’t do much about it.

[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He can propose laws to the legislative bramch. He might not be able to pass it himself but he could push and advocate for it

[–] cole@lemdro.id 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure the GOP-led house would be very receptive to that

[–] conductor@lemmy.ml -5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Oh what does it hurt then?

Can’t say anything, because of the GOP.

Super cool having a democrat president who’s got no balls. Can’t offend the house.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What does it hurt? Political capital, for one.

Also, you don't just say, "let's make a law about X", and a 3,000 page bill just appears in front of you. That shit takes TONS of work. Biden can't just materialize a workable plan that both parties (in this political climate? lol) will ever agree on.

That just isn't how this country works. If you want this to change, Congress has to change it.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I love how "political capital" is the neolibs go-to excuse for why the working class can't be helped. Yet there's a never ending amount of "political capital" I help giant corporations make more money. Fucking tools

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What? Do you think I like that political capital is a thing? It's fucking gross. I am just acknowledging reality. What do you think the President actually does in the US?

Like, do you even realize that you're advocating for authoritarianism? Or is it OK, as long as it's the person doing the things you want? And we all know situations like that are super sustainable...

[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 1 points 11 months ago

“The president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch's authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.”

I hope you direct all that useless anger you have here on the internet for voting time, then.

We just had local elections here nationally in the U.S., whom did you place your vote for to solve this issue?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

You are literally demanding virtue signalling.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

This is a thread about him saying things.

[–] graymess@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Price controls are well within the president's powers. It's not that radical of a concept.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's within congress's powers for sure. I don't think the president. Congress has done it in the past though, so they for sure can again.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

Republicans would never allow it.

[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 7 points 11 months ago

Why is this upvoted?

No, the president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch's authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

In what country?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The US was pretty good about taxing corporations before Reagan

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

Biden can't set tax rates.

load more comments (8 replies)