98
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

President Joe Biden goes into next year’s election with a vexing challenge: Just as the U.S. economy is getting stronger, people are still feeling horrible about it.

Pollsters and economists say there has never been as wide a gap between the underlying health of the economy and public perception. The divergence could be a decisive factor in whether the Democrat secures a second term next year. Republicans are seizing on the dissatisfaction to skewer Biden, while the White House is finding less success as it tries to highlight economic progress.

“Things are getting better and people think things are going to get worse — and that’s the most dangerous piece of this,” said Democratic pollster Celinda Lake, who has worked with Biden. Lake said voters no longer want to just see inflation rates fall — rather, they want an outright decline in prices, something that last happened on a large scale during the Great Depression.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] darganon@lemmy.world 56 points 6 months ago

I make $17k more than I did in 2016, but according to the inflation calculator, I make $15k less than I did in 2016.

The underlying health and future prospects of the economy being positive is great, but things are just eye wateringly expensive compared to a few years ago.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

When the economy is doing well, that means businesses are doing well. When businesses do well, the workers are paid less. The economy is not your friend.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Or some people like to say “the stock market is not the economy”. Which I think points in the same general direction.

[-] BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago
[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[-] BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee -2 points 6 months ago

I believe average but I'm not sure that's particularly relevant here. We're talking about wages, not wealth. It's the latter that your Bezos's, Zucks, etc can potentially throw off when measuring averages.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I believe average

I was asking about which specific kind of average.

[-] BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee -2 points 6 months ago

I can only go by the words that you use when you ask a question my guy, and the words you used indicated that you were asking if it was the average (mean) OR the middle figure in the distribution of incomes (median).

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

"Average" can mean either mean, median, or mode. You're the one who doesn't know what words mean, not me.

[-] BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Regardless of whether that's technically true, the context in my initial comment made it clear that the answer to your question is "mean", did it not? I specifically cited those wealthy outliers to exclude median since outliers wouldn't change a median value, after all.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Still, it would be interesting to see the distribution of these wages, whether the whole distribution shifted uniformly to increase the average, or it just became more skewed

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
98 points (93.0% liked)

politics

18073 readers
2962 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS