Programmer Humor

19503 readers

1269 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

490

GitHub Desktop or Git CLI? (programming.dev)

submitted 11 months ago by hypnotic_nerd@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 34 points 11 months ago (4 children)

JetBrains IDEs, I don't remember the last time I used the CLI.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 39 points 11 months ago (1 children)

you have forgotten the face of your father

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 10 points 11 months ago

Linus Torvalds?

[–] eluvatar@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

This is the way

[–] CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I was looking for this comment. PHP storm and git are like best friends. I very very rarely need to resort to the CLI and generally that's for hard resetting after I screw something up

[–] expr@programming.dev -5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Good luck doing anything remotely complicated/useful in git with an IDE. You get a small fraction of what git can do with a tool that allows absolutely 0 scripting and automation.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

IDE git is less powerful than CLI git. However I'm pretty confident that most people use more features of git by using a GUI.

CLI feature discoverability is pretty awful, you have to go out of your way and type git help to learn new commands.

With a GUI though, all the buttons are there, you just have to click a new button that you've been seeing for a while and the GUI will guide you how to use it.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 10 points 11 months ago

It sounds like you don't speak from experience. I have all the automation I need. It supports git hooks on top of IDE-only features like code checking.

If I have to fire up my CLI for some mass history rewriting (like changing an author for every commit), or when the repo breaks - so be it. But by not using the CLI I save my fingers and sanity, because committing a bunch of files is several click away with little to no room for error.

I can rebase, patch, drop, rename, merge, revert, cherry pick, and solve conflicts with a click of a button rather than remembering all the commands and whatnot.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

I use the cli, but my main goal is to never have to do anything remotely complicated with git. Does it happen sometimes? Of course.

[–] muddi@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There are automations. You can even add git hooks iirc. Mostly I find the lint and other code quality integrations nice to have in the IDE, since the inline results allow me to navigate directly to the code

Diffing is a lot easier too