this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
2044 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18977 readers
3322 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Colorado Supreme Court is removing former President Donald Trump from the primary ballot, saying he is ineligible to be president.

In a stunning and unprecedented decision, the Colorado Supreme Court removed former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 ballot, ruling that he isn’t an eligible presidential candidate because of the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban.”

“Even when the siege on the Capitol was fully underway, he continued to support it by repeatedly demanding that Vice President (Mike) Pence refuse to perform his constitutional duty and by calling Senators to persuade them to stop the counting of electoral votes.

“President Trump’s direct and express efforts, over several months, exhorting his supporters to march to the Capitol to prevent what he falsely characterized as an alleged fraud on the people of this country were indisputably overt and voluntary.”

Ratified after the Civil War, the 14th Amendment says officials who take an oath to support the Constitution are banned from future office if they “engaged in insurrection.” But the wording is vague, it doesn’t explicitly mention the presidency, and has only been applied twice since 1919.

We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these unAmerican lawsuits,” Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said in a statement.

Chief Justice Brian Boatright, one of the three dissenters on the seven-member court, wrote that he believes Colorado election law “was not enacted to decide whether a candidate engaged in insurrection,” and said he would have dismissed the challenge to Trump’s eligibility.

LINKS

AP: Colorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause | @negativenull@startrek.website

Washington Post: Donald Trump is barred from Colorado’s 2024 primary ballot, the state Supreme Court rules | @silence7@slrpnk.net

CNBC: Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, pauses ruling to allow appeal | @return2ozma

NBC News: Colorado Supreme Court kicks Donald Trump off the state's 2024 ballot for violating the U.S. Constitution. | 18-24-61-B-17-17-4

CNN: Colorado Supreme Court removes Trump from 2024 ballot | A Phlaming Phoenix

CNN:Colorado Supreme Court removes Trump from 2024 ballot based on 14th Amendment’s ‘insurrectionist ban’ | @Boddhisatva

New York Times: Trump Is Disqualified From the 2024 Ballot, Colorado Supreme Court Rules | @silence7@slrpnk.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quaternions@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago (5 children)

No, it just means that he won't be on the ballot. Which means that he'll unlikely win their electorate votes. He could still win the presidency without them. Hell, he could even win there as a write in candidate.

However, this could set a precedent for other states to do the same thing.

[–] devoiced@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

This ban would cover write-in votes as well

[–] athos77@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

He could still win the presidency without them. Hell, he could even win there as a write in candidate.

I would love for his votes to be subject to the same amount of scrupulousness they subject Democratic votes to.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It makes it harder for him to win the primary, though he's pretty far ahead

[–] root_beer@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

Good call; if he’s off the ballot for the general, does that automatically ban him from the primary as well? Seems like it’s a given but I have to ask anyway

[–] generic@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Write-in votes would require his supporters knowing how to write/spell his name.

[–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

To be fair, they would just have to copy his name off of one of the several t-shirts they own/are currently wearing.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

So essentially, Colorado voters can't add to Trump's support for either the Republican nomination, or for the presidency?

For the Republican nomination, though, isn't the party a private organisation, such that they can fudge their results - e.g. by discounting Colorado's votes altogether or by informally surveying the state? Or are they held legally to democratic voting to choose their candidate?

I understand that if they do nominate Trump nationwide, it means the state of Colorado can't vote for him - but they're unlikely to anyway, right? So it means zero loss for Trump? Unless other states follow suit. (And the loss of face.)