1232
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Noam Chomsky once said that his dealings and business with Epstein were none of our business and we should fuck off. I hope we get to find out more about his and other rich people's dealings with Epstein

[-] S_204@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

Chomsky lost his mind decades ago, he's for sure on the list and would probably justify it in some pseudoscientific bs way.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Meanwhile advocating for Ukraine to just lay down and die

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago
[-] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 months ago
[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 6 months ago

"What was known about Jeffrey Epstein was that he had been convicted of a crime and had served his sentence," Chomsky told the Journal about his meetings. "According to U.S. laws and norms, that yields a clean slate.

That's not a bad argument. He said the discussed politics and philosophy. Nothing suggests that there was any minors involved.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I don't see why he wouldn't want that to be public knowledge. What Epstein did was so awful you really would want to clear your name if you had any connection to the man.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don’t see why he wouldn’t want that to be public knowledge. What Epstein did was so awful you really would want to clear your name if you had any connection to the man.

Richard Stallman got cancelled for trying to clear Marvin Minsky's name. Not only had Minsky himself not actually done anything wrong, but Stallman wasn't even connected to Epstein except in a "six degrees of Kevin Bacon" sort of way. Yet he got kicked off the Free Software Foundation board for it anyway (at least until 'truth got its boots on' and folks came to their senses and reinstated him).

That's how absolutely radioactive this shit is.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Richard Stallman got "cancelled" because he was sexually harassing everybody with boobs and walking on two legs and had been for decades according to people who dealt with him at work and conferences. Oh I am sorry were you hoping I didn't know about that?

[-] stetech@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

You’re not seriously citing Stallman as someone who should be defended, are you?

https://drewdevault.com/2023/11/25/2023-11-26-RMS-on-sex.html

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

I agree with you, but also I have seen many times how trigger-happy internet crowd may be. Maybe he thinks that nobody will read an explanation past the first word. Or maybe he's guilty of abuses, we'll hopefully see

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

It is freaken Chomsky. Have you heard his name one time? Congratulations, you now have an opinion about him. And said opinion is very very extreme.

The man is either an intellectual titan in a wide variety of fields and the one consistent voice of morality for +60 years or batshit insane impractical plagiarism commiting fraud who thinks the best thing western civilization can do is suicide while leaving an apology note. Nothing in between.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

Wow, yeah, I only heard part of it, think I should go read a bit

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
1232 points (99.5% liked)

News

21721 readers
3303 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS