1232
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] herrwoland@lemmy.world 299 points 6 months ago

"Sorry the cameras malfunctioned and 4 of the guards destroyed the documents then committed suicide. Nothing is to be done here."

[-] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 104 points 6 months ago

Something something Panama Papers...

[-] MMNT@lemmy.world 84 points 6 months ago

I bet that Venn diagram is a circle.

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world 139 points 6 months ago

Why this list was ever sealed to begin with is beyond me.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 97 points 6 months ago

Because powerful people were his associates. I'm surprised it is being unsealed.

[-] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm not surprised it was ordered to be unsealed. I'll be more than a little surprised if an accurate list is actually unsealed. But, anything's possible I guess.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

“Those on the list were allowed to redact whatever parts they liked”

[-] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Deborah Jeane Palfrey has entered the chat. ~~I swear I remember seeing news stories at the time saying that she'd specifically told family members: I'm not planning to kill myself, but I am threatening to release the identities of powerful men who made use of my services. If I die it's because they killed me.~~

But now, all I can find is that it was clearly a suicide. Oh well.

Edit: Someone argued with me enough about it that I actually tried to read up on it, and I think what I was remembering was that Alex Jones said that if she died it's because they killed her, and some people reported on that, along with some carefully cherry-picked quotes from her interview on his show. She did say that she wasn't planning to kill herself, but only because he directly asked her as part of his normal Alex Jones shtick, and of course she said "no." But she never said that on any other program, as far as I can tell, and everyone reliable who investigated concluded that the suicide was probably real. So the mystery is resolved. Sounds like she killed herself. 😢 At least I learned something today.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

Well they needed to clean it first before they unsealed it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mhague@lemmy.world 71 points 6 months ago

Most of the names will be innocent people and victims. All of them will be sent death threats and harassed because people will consider them pedophiles. People can't understand two things at once (Epstein was a socialite and a child trafficker) and they don't know what being an associate of Epstein implies. There's good reasons to keep the list private from the masses.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

It's funny that those people will be threatened, but people we know have been involved in bribery at the highest levels of our government are not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 11 points 6 months ago

Not sure how true this is given:

Anyone who did not successfully fight to keep their name out of the civil case could see their name become public -- including Epstein's victims, co-conspirators and innocent associates.

I imagine anyone who was innocent and an associate had the money to hire the right lawyers to remove themselves.

I also imagine those who should be on it, also won't be.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 32 points 6 months ago

To protect the privacy of the rich?

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 27 points 6 months ago

Probably more because it'll tip the ones who actually have cases open on them off.

That's like 90% of what's in still classified docs from controversial moments in domestic investigations, information which could show the hand to people currently under investigation, and also techniques the FBI uses in evidence gathering which aren't known to the wider public and who's exposure could lead to suspects catching wise and closing the avenue.

If you've ever seen one of those get smart posts about how to avoid being identified at a demonstration, Domestic Intelligence is openly trying to avoid more shit being added to those lists of ways to avoid detection. Yes it's absolutely adversarial to the privacy of the public but it's a lot less conspiratorial than a blood libel agenda to cover up the child trafficking of the rich.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 79 points 6 months ago

Until another judge says it will stay sealed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] USSEthernet@startrek.website 76 points 6 months ago

Anyone who did not successfully fight to keep their name out of the civil case could see their name become public -- including Epstein's victims, co-conspirators and innocent associates.

Well, this tells us that we probably won't see any notable people in the release then...

[-] CyberDine@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Anyone not powerful, rich or politically-connected enough to scrub their names from the record will be shown."

This is 100% going to fuck all of the victims and none of the perpetrators.

[-] Dragomus@lemmy.world 56 points 6 months ago

They'll unseal them but all envelopes contain only an "I Owe You" from Trump, and under his signature he wrote in small font "I declassified them after I took them home"

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 52 points 6 months ago

Uh-oh, we bout to have a dead judge!

load more comments (39 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago

Hope that judge has real good security.

[-] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 37 points 6 months ago

The judge was shot 400 times, a likely suicide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

I hope that judge is well protected and this isn't an edited list of people.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Noam Chomsky once said that his dealings and business with Epstein were none of our business and we should fuck off. I hope we get to find out more about his and other rich people's dealings with Epstein

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] BlackPit@feddit.ch 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

January 1 - This is just the emotionally charged distraction. Keep watchful for the event that needs to go under the radar. A change in laws or policy, a new war, or anything that is meant to erode people's privacy, security or freedom. The US has a history of implementing undesirable changes during holiday periods when there's little opposition. Possibly something like this;

https://act.eff.org/action/tell-congress-they-must-defeat-hpsci-s-horrific-surveillance-bill

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is set to expire on December 31, 2023

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

There goes the entire Republican Party

[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

The goes the government

[-] TorJansson@lemm.ee 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It will be real interesting to see who files a motion objecting to the unsealing and appeals it to a higher court.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
1232 points (99.5% liked)

News

21700 readers
3195 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS