353
submitted 5 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Religious BS, probably. Marriage is religious in origin.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 15 points 5 months ago

Not religious in origin, but the people who propose using it as exclusions to laws think so.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Nah pair mating happens in other species. Religion just got its claws into it at some point.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 6 points 5 months ago

Meh. True monogamy is quite rare in mammals.

Used to think monogamy was very common in birds, but IRC thanks to DNA testing, we now know plenty of baby birds have a different daddy. Ie. they raise the baby together, but they have an open relationship and impregnate/get impregnated by other birds.

Apparently that's surprisingly rare in humans.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Less that they "have an open relationship" and more that the birds sneak around behind each-other's backs. Males go off and try to sneakily impregnate other females, females sneak around and try to get impregnated by other males. You find it in apes too.

Isn't this anthropomorphizing, though? Is there evidence that the mates would experience emotional distress if they learned their partners were "cheating" on them?

Being in a consensually monogamous relationship, I know I would and my husband would, but how much of that is cultural? I'm not really convinced it's something that's ubiquitous in the animal kingdom, though if you have a source about this that discredits my (admittedly amateurish) hypothesis, I'd be open to learning more.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Sure, but saying "have an open relationship" is also anthropomorphizing. Also, sneaking around describes what happens much better. I don't know what it looks like with birds, but with apes when a non-dominant male mates with a female, they have to sneak around to do it. If the dominant male catches the non-dominant male he'll attack him.

Here's an example from monkeys:

https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/monkeys-try-to-hide-illicit-hookups

I haven't found articles about chimps and gorillas, but I remember it being similar.

Huh today I learned something interesting! Thanks for the link.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Marriage and monogamous pairs are different though. You can have one without the other.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Sure and you can have landownership without paperwork. Pretty confident if you went on a guys farm plot 10k years ago he would make it clear who owned it.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Birds ain't getting married my dude

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

No it isn't. Religion usurped it and claim they invented it but it's older than that

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

How much older? And were the origins devoid of religious influence?

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago

I'd be curious about this claim. There's pair bonding in other species, and other species that are (mostly) monogamous, but an explicit formal declaration of a monogamous pairing is something that doesn't happen until you have some kind of culture and by the time we have any kinds of surviving records (even mostly coherent oral traditions) of anything religion already has it claws in a lot of things.

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
353 points (85.8% liked)

News

21687 readers
3999 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS