this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
2350 points (99.9% liked)

Privacy

31995 readers
583 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And since you won't be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility.

The community feedback is... interesting to say the least.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Obligatory use Firefox

No way. Why should I feel obligated to use something I feel has inferior UX and UI than the browser I'm using now? For Mozilla's CEO to rais her wage (again): https://calpaterson.com/mozilla.html ?

You people are really delusional if you really think that Mozilla are the only good guys (or good guys at all, for that matters).

Inb4, unimaginative people downvoting just because they can't stand different opinions.

[–] Teodomo@lemmy.world 120 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

What's your alternative?

EDIT: Oh I just found in the profile. It's Brave. I used it for half a year before I got tired of the crypto ads sneaking into my home page's links no matter how many times I deleted them and of some other stuff. I prefer Firefox's UI. Also I don't expect any browser to be 100% ethical but Brave is below Firefox in that list for me

[–] Restaldt@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you truly cared about the state of the internet youd only browse websites with wget and text editors

Or something

[–] dewritochan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

https://lynx.invisible-island.net/ come now, we don't have to be barbarians, there's text browsers out there

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It doesn't matter and it's irrelevant here. I just despise Mozilla and their false morality. Use whatever you want.

[–] antisoma@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not irrelevant since you stated Firefox is less good than what you are using now. Of course people are interested in a feasible alternative. So, since you introduced it, what are you using instead?

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I said that I feel it's less good. I'm not going to tell people what they should use and I surely won't tell them to use the same browser I use. People should simply use whatever they prefer/suits them best.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you'll rather give in to blatant corporate greed?

What kind of Alt-Right logic is this?

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I didn't know I was so evil that I'm doing the world a worse place just because I prefer a different browser. And I'm ideologically far form alt-right, btw.

OTOH, talking about corporate greed:

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that is a funny graph. Even assuming the data is true, it deliberately missrepresents market share as usage. Which pretty much neglects the fact hat maybe a person or two and a device with a browser or two have entered the market since then.

Also it does not have any information on source of the data, methodology, definition of the terms etc. So it is pretty much worthless as an argument.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that is a funny graph. Even assuming the data is true, it deliberately missrepresents market share as usage. Which pretty much neglects the fact hat maybe a person or two and a device with a browser or two have entered the market since then.

Fine, so on the same basis we can also reject the "chromium dominance" argument, which is the main selling point of Mozilla.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno. Using Microsoft Edge feels like good enough for me.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That doesnt really have anything to do with what I said?

That said, the reason Edge feels like good enough for you is probably because you don't know very much about / haven't tried other browsers.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nice detective skills. I have the opposite view about Brave/Mozilla. But fine, we can agree to disagree and still be (virtual) friends.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Opposite view of what? Brave is peddling crypto bullshit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We don’t wanna be friends with crypto-bros here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I downvoted you because you made a terrible case for yourself. Learn to make a salient point, or learn to love being "edgy". the choice is up to you, but the internet already has plenty of the latter, why not become the former?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel obligated to raise awareness about these topics. I won't prevent anyone from choosing Chrome, but at the very least it's important for people to know what their choice can entail, and base their decision on that.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago

We also need to raise awareness about what giving google hegemony over defining what the web will be means.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I won't prevent anyone from using FF, either. I just think that the "obligatory use Firefox" is quite arrogant, to say the least. And, to be honest, I'm quite happy it's not going to happen until FF is managed by Mozilla and their poor choices.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

The obligatory use Firefox has been a running gag in the FOSS community for ages now. Nothing arrogant about it, though it does come across as a bit blunt and brazen, to be fair.

It's just that letting a single entity be the ultimate authority on how the internet (or anything, for that matter) should look like is objectively a bad idea.

Especially when that entity is widely known for being insidiously self serving, malicious and manipulative.

That being said, enough people have explained this already, so I'm gonna leave it there.

Have a nice day

[–] mrmanager 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There is a huge difference between mozilla and google. That's quite obvious to most. The ceo raising his salary is a problem for you, and you prefer Google, where they have enormous salaries and incomes? It's one of the richest companies in the world.

Firefox doesn't have inferior UX at all. It has more functions and features than chrome. It also has very good default privacy and the plugin system is amazing.

And it just became faster than chrome as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're not saying you should feel obligated to use Firefox. It's a tongue-in-cheek joke about how everything FLOSS, Privacy or GDPR related always includes a comment thread about using Firefox. I use Brave too but you gotta read the room. Lemmy users in general are going to be much more pro-Firefox than anything else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VoxAdActa@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

Dude, look, I'm sorry Firefox killed your dog (or whatever). But please stop spamming your irrational hate-boner for Mozilla all over the thread.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

UX is not worse than Chrome, please shut up.

[–] YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)