this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
284 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
314 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 114 points 8 months ago (36 children)

Fuck trucks. I remember the Ranger it was barely bigger than a minivan. These things are obscene. People who own them don't need them. Most people don't even need trucks. People like to cosplay that they live up a 25 degree incline of muddy, rocky road. But a subaru would be just fine and IS in most of the world.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 30 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I drive a B2300 (the Mazda rebrand of the Ranger) and it kicks ass. I get 7-8L per 100km, when commuting, I've filled it to the tits with dirt, flooring and lumber, and it doesn't take up 2 parking spaces. I would pay an obscene amount to get the same truck but as an EV today. Why the fuck is that not a thing?!?

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 26 points 8 months ago

Best we can do is a behemoth truck that doesn't fit in spots and costs a first born child.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is actually a good point, why are there no small EV trucks?

I bet they exist in China.

[–] rubicon@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

I see lots of Rivians where I live. I'm not about to spend $130k on a small truck though.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Ford Maverick is the size of the old school rangers. I have a hybrid one and love it. Only problem is finding one not marked up sky high.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ever heard of a Ford Maverick? It's not a "real" truck since it's unibody instead of body-on-frame, but otherwise it's the next best thing to the old Ranger.

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Transverse engine + transaxle + biased toward FWD

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Like I said, it's (unfortunately) not a real truck.

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah. At that point, get a wagon and a trailer. That's my current setup but I am pushing the limits of it. 3 people + luggage + trailer + 2x 500lb bikes is really more than that flat 4 and CVT wants. I'm already having to do suspension mods to make it more comfortable and I'm still (officially) 700lbs under the tow rating.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

The b23 was a great truck, though.

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago

I recently bought a 2010 B4000 and it is a great size for a truck.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I remember the Ranger it was barely bigger than a minivan.

I own a Ranger and used to own a Ford Aerostar. I'm pretty sure they were literally built on the same platform. Also, my Ranger is a regular cab short bed, while my Aerostar was the long wheelbase version, so the van was definitely bigger.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My dad used to have an Aerostar, loved that goofy looking little minivan. Ended up getting a Plymouth Voyager that looked very similar.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The nerdiest part of me wanted to modify mine to look like a shuttlecraft from Star Trek. I never went through with it, though.

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I used to have a ~'99 ranger. Loved that thing. Now the closest thing Ford has is the maverick which is not only bigger overall but it has a smaller bed so it's less useful.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

'10 B2300 driver. Why will no one make a real compact pickup instead of a movie theater with a 4 foot box?!?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 8 months ago

I do appreciate Ford has the Maverick now as well.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I would love an old Ranger with the extended cab and suicide doors....I hate the new ones are f150 sized. Also the Tacoma structurally is no larger than the original tiny version...it's all puffy body panels. Why can't we ha have small trucks?

[–] Lodra@programming.dev 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

I probably don’t represent most people very well. But my wife and I have a single vehicle, a gmc sierra 1500. We probably use the bed twice a week. Trash/recycling. Moving heavy things around our property. Makes for a great mobile workbench for projects outside. And most often of all, we buy hay and grain for horses. A smaller truck would be a problem for us. We would actually benefit from a larger truck! But I don’t want a bigger gas guzzler. We get great fuel efficiency given the size of the truck.

Edit: I also don’t live in a city. It’s quite rural here

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That, seems like a proper use.

I see many trucks with huge mud tires that they use as a main vehicle to commute to and from work and to run errands. I think these are the target for most people.

[–] thedevisinthedetails@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Obviously not (yet?) available in the US but other countries have much smaller trucks with larger beds. https://www.kia.com/dm/showroom/K2700-2022/specification.html

That plus a 2200 lb hauling capacity make them a very capable, efficient, and reasonably safe truck.

[–] Lodra@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago

Kinda funny how much the styles differ between USA and Europe πŸ™‚. Looks like a great work truck. No space for a car seat in the back though so you would need a separate family vehicle. Which might be practical anyway!

This would satisfy my regular truck needs. But a 2200lb hauling capacity doesn’t work well with horses. A single horse can easily weighs 1200 pounds.

I could see this being great for many people here. But it’s also not a universal fit.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago

I saw a similar truck in the US the other day, a Honda Street/Acty. It was so cute!

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

won't be. There's federal legislation that basically says a vehicle has to be large to burn fuel like that, so you can't make a small truck unless it makes small car mileage. The idea was that the auto manufacturers would improve mileage if forced, but you know how it usually goes when politicians try to direct engineers to make bullshit physics reality.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you run a farm? Meaning is your truck use for your business or job?

[–] Lodra@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago

I consider it a hobby farm. We currently have 2 horses and 3 goats. But it’s not a business at all and doesn’t generate income.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Godort@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

My first car was a '92 Ranger and it was a great little thing to have at that point in my life. It's really nice to be able to move without needing to worry about how to transport all your stuff to the new place and it was small enough that it still felt like a regular sized car.

The new rangers are pretty ridiculous in comparison.

load more comments (29 replies)