this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
45 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22711 readers
88 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Are they cops?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glans@hexbear.net 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wow a lake with no fish "naturally" thats crazy. Why didnt anyone bring fish there earlier?

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago

theres no way for fish to get in its not fed by rivers

[–] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Because it was a sacred site for natives whose ancestors witnessed the eruption and the lake's creation. Also the only population center nearby is next to the Klamath river, one of the largest sources of salmon in North America before the dams decimated them

Fish were only brought by the second administrator of the park. He stole it from the first guy, who he literally fought because he had business interests there and they were from competing political parties. Fish destroyed the delicate ecosystem of the lake. It will never recover because it's impossible to remove all the fish