this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
505 points (98.1% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3708 readers
572 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable, neither is supporting people who actively want to kill those groups. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] somePotato@sh.itjust.works 47 points 9 months ago (8 children)

I assume there's some in universe reason why they can't / don't keep copies of the teleportation data, otherwise everyone would be effectively indestructible

"Oh no the captain got eaten by a space tiger"

"No problem, I'll teleport a backup from an hour ago, he'll be there in 5 minutes"

[–] tristan@aussie.zone 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My first thought was wouldn't that reset our memories to that point too?

Granted losing some memories or being dead is a pretty easy choice, but using it to reverse aging or other physical things would be a costly one

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Would YOU lose "some memory", or would you be destroyed and the transporter would recreate a person who believes to be you from a previous point in time?

And how do we know that isn't what happens every single time someone is beamed somewhere?

[–] tristan@aussie.zone 9 points 9 months ago

Calm down Theseus

But yes, I'm on the "it's essentially a clone" and the original is killed side of that argument, so it would just be a copy of you that believes they lost time somehow until someone told them what happened

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We do know they hold genetic templates, per Picard season 3. No reason they couldn't hold full templates for VIP's.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

And now we know the real reason why Picard never aged....

[–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I was thinking about this as a deep philosophical question yesterday. Wondering, if that technology was available would I be totally unafraid of accidental death, knowing that I could simply be restored to a recent backup. I came to the conclusion that I would still feel, and act, the same as I do now. Which made me realise that I must believe there is something more to us than pure biology as the backup wouldn't be "me". I'm certainly not religious and have no concept of what this "more than biology" might be - it just came as a logical result of my feelings about my backup.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If we had these back ups, are you sure they are you though? If you died, the 'you' that you feel you are right now would be gone, but a new one based on a saved state of the old you would be born with your memories. Unless there is another form of energy our consciousness takes then we would die just the same, but with a new clone that would feel like they are a continuation of the same person.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If my convoluted comment made sense, it would depend on how you define 'you'. Like say there is an afterlife, if I died and was replaced by this backup, 'I' would experience this life after death, being a ghost or whatever, while a new 'me' would come about thinking they were saved and living.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's at least as likely that "afterlife" you is a copy as any backup.

Heck, you today aren't really the same you as yesterday. You identify with yesterday you because you share most of the same memories.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

That is true, and the whole 'ship of Theseus' thing. I enjoyed the game Soma, this concept is a main theme of the game

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Still a difference whether you turn into a different person through change and learning or whether you end. Period. While a different person does whatever, believing to be a continuation of you.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

What is the difference? If somebody stops you then restarts you, are you the same person? If half your brain is destroyed doctors recreate it from a back up and merge it with the surviving half, are you still you, half you, someone completely new?

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that anybody has enough knowledge on that matter to answer that question. From the outside, it may well look like the same entity boots up in both cases, because the new version may run on the same processes. However, we do not know whether there is person #1 who simply does not return and is survived by person #2 who is and feels identical. In today's technological situation, ripping someone apart with the caveat "don't worry, we'll build a puppet that is identical to you in all details somewhere else" would not fill me with confidence.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The transporter question, the "backup" question, are only difficult if you take the body to be the "vessel of the soul", but it isn't.

The body creates the soul, or even better, the soul is a normal process of the body.

You say that there's no way to tell which is you from the outside. There's also no way to tell from the inside.

Imagine a copy is made of you while you're sleeping. When you awake, how would you tell which you were? Your only chance would be to find out what happened to your two bodies while you were sleeping, to look for external clues.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I posit that there is a way of telling whether I am. And if I am no longer, that status would stop. Whether someone else someplace else thinks they are I at that point is irrelevant in that regard at that point if I have stopped being.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 9 months ago

Read "Schild's Ladder" by Greg Egan. It's a hard sci-fi novel where "backups" play a significant role in people's lives.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would argue that the transport buffer isn't big enough, but I think they stored a pile of settlers in there one episode.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

They've done that sort of thing a couple of times, but it's always been a dirty hack that happened in an emergency. For example, in the TNG episode "Relics," Scotty put himself effectively in stasis for 70 years by setting the buffer to continually refresh itself like DRAM, and in the DS9 episode "Our Man Bashir" there was a transporter malfunction and they had to wipe the memory of almost the whole station in order to find enough space to store the command crew's neural patterns, overwriting Bashir's holosuite program so the crew's likenesses replaced the characters.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If you'd start this game, it's hard to end it. Immortality, swarms of clones created just for labor, identity steal, and worse of all – people would grow negligent and the series would lose any stakes.

I think that at some point everyone agreed that the cycle of life is a core of what makes us humanoids and pushes us to strive for self-improvement.

It also prevents societal degradation, because immortality goes hand in hand with tyranny and lack of meaningful natural change.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago

the series would lose any stakes.

That's the only real reason

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

and pushes us to strive for self-improvement.

That is why whenever you see old people having to wait in line or dealing with retail workers they are so understanding and polite. Which is also reflected in their voting, you know how they always want to raise taxes to pay for welfare programs they do not benefit from, peace despite not having anything at stake, and a more tolerant understanding society. Also their TV choices. I just think Fox News (average viewer age in 60s) is so gentle and naive.

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

With zero knowledge on the series, I'll just go ahead and fill the lore:

They have tried it in the past with someone who died but the recreated body was just an empty entity. It had vital signs and reacted to stimuli, but it wasn't the person and didn't have a will to live.

There's no scientific explanation, it's one of the mysteries of life.

The end.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I know you said you have no knowledge of the series, but there's actually one character (Riker) that does get teleporter cloned in an episode of tng. That's probably the basis of this whole post.

And if I recall correctly they also used teleporter shenanigans to explain how scotty from the original series could still be around to rescue in tng.

So it's a bit of an elephant in the room

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Do you want Eve Online? Because this is how you get Eve Online.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Off the top of my head: When Pulaski got old age disease, they just transporter beam deaged her to fix it.

In Rascals, they made several people about 12, despite them starting from various ages (from maybe 30 to hundreds of years old). Of course they beamed them back to older in the end.