this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
325 points (93.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4297 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

While it's all certainly Americans, and we don't like genocides, she is correct in assuming that Putin wants Trump to win, and this would be an effective way to further that goal.

Don't forget Putin was KGB.

I imagine it's more through social media manipulation and misinformation than FSB funding, I suppose I could be wrong. By way of example, though, how many times have you heard that white phosphorous is banned, even though that's not exactly true?

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

FSB is using social media among other things. Active Measures is one of primary ways how they operated and they adapted it well to the Internet age.

Have you thought how come that antivaxx people also have very pro Russia anti EU, anti UN anti NATO views?

Covid was a great catalyst in spreading disinformation.

Same thing with far right people in US and Europe, how come their views are mostly pro Russia and how come they greatly overlap with antivaxx?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wanted you to be wrong, but you’re right.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Thanks for providing a link.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've honestly just stopped doing that explainer because Israel is using it illegally.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

True. But the propaganda line doesn't acknowledge the distinction, and just tries to spread the idea that the US does not care about international law, which is false.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ahhh yes. I had someone run that with landmines too. According to them we can't get in compliance with international law until we de-mine the Korean DMZ...

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Landmines are also not banned. There's a lot of subtly misleading bullshit on the internet.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is a section on them that most of the world has signed. It's basically the US, Russia, and China that haven't signed.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It's a little more complicated than that, because there are many different kinds of landmines. Nobody bans them all.