this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
176 points (78.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

30017 readers
601 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Interesting, what would be the alternative? Technology, culture, religion, military? Taking those options out of Civ

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I think that's the key question. Like, I get capitalism is hedgemonical (is that even a word?), but what alternative do you propose?

[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Capitalism is the worst economic system, except for all the others."

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What about socialism - ie, everyone gets their basic needs met, but is free to work for more.

[–] HolyDiver@aussie.zone 6 points 10 months ago

It almost seems logical huh

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Something like universal basic income along with free healthcare, education and social safety nets definitely is an attractive idea but even providing the basic needs for everyone is expensive as hell and you can't just pay for it by cutting CEO pay. Economy is such a complex system that radical changes like this are guranteed to introduce new unexpected problems. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't try and find ways to make the world a better place for everyone but I feel like so many people naively think that the solution is obvious and right there and we're just not doing it.

[–] throwwyacc@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You're probably describing capitalism with social welfare/safety nets. Whereas often socialism is considered to be specifically not capitalism and may not allow for the idea of working to get more resources

Fundamentally you're probably happy with capitalism in terms of economy but want further govt regulation/welfare. Which I think is probably the best system we have

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 7 points 10 months ago

You could start by giving everyone a share of profits rather than pushing all the money up towards the people who have the most.

Let machines do the work so we can do what we want with our time. We're working more than people did in the past despite our technology. And the reason we have to is the alternative is starving to death in the streets.

Both of these things violate the principles of capitalism.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Kinda the spelling is hegemonic for further reference.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Not having merit based on how much money something makes would be a start.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

barter system worked fine for thousands of years

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago

…in a very localized and narrow market.

It's not that simple of an answer. If you want to label the past working fine as such you also have to accept and include the living standards and social-economic environment. Because our environment and world and how we live today are vastly different from back then.

How would you barter-trade production parts of a car, the building of a car, and then that car? How would you barter-trade research and technology development?

Without money, do you pay in a narrow, restrictive way like a place to live and food? Or do you pay in something that can be traded like money - where you practically replaced currency money with a different form of currency money?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

religion

I'd love to see how that one plays out. Lol

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Tbf we ostensibly already have and are again.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Being a lonely hunter gatherer.

If you have crafted nice spears and axes, but you have no food, that’s too bad. You’re not allowed to barter with talented hunters who can’t make spears as nice as you can. Go hunt your own food or die of starvation in this non-commerce based society.

Oh wait, how about we allow trading after all?

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Comparative Advanta-whoosy whatsits?

Seems complicated, let's get rid of it.