this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
249 points (98.8% liked)

World News

32045 readers
793 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

the sheer hysteria over this is equal parts hilarious and revealing

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

#BlueAnon report:

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: smells like russian troll

[–] somename@hexbear.net 20 points 7 months ago

Rookie mistake. I always take a shower before posting.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago
[–] aniki@lemm.ee -1 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Find me a single American journalist that interviewed Hitler after he invaded Poland. I'll wait.

[–] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Karl H. von Wiegand, an American journalist, met Hitler first in 1921. Poland was invaded on 1 September, 1939 by the Third Reich. A month after Germany invaded France in World War II, on June 11, 1940, he secured another interview with Hitler. He's the only American who had the chance to interview Hitler.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 25 points 7 months ago

Not only that, but US companies such as Ford and IBM continued to do business with Germany well into the war. And of course, we shouldn't forget that nazis were directly inspired by US race laws, but initially even they found them to be too extreme.

Moyers: Bilbo said, “One drop of Negro blood placed in the veins of the purest Caucasian destroys the inventive genius of his mind and palsies his creative faculty.” Is it true that the Nazis thought the one-drop rule too extreme?

Whitman: They did indeed. They never proposed anything nearly as extreme as the one-drop rule. In fact the standard, the most far-reaching Nazi definitions of who counted as a Jew, matched the least far-reaching ones to be found in the American states. Virtually all American definitions of who counted as a black were far more draconian than anything found in any Nazi proposal. At the same time, the Nazi literature expressed real discomfort about the so-called one-drop rule, which, I have to say, was not found in every American state, as there were a variety of approaches in the US. But it was understandably notorious. The Nazis, difficult as it is to imagine, described the one-drop rule as inhuman, as “involving human hardness that’s going much, much too far, you couldn’t do that kind of thing,” they said. And their own definitions for who counted as a Jew, especially those that were ultimately attached to the Nuremberg Laws, were more restricted than anything to be found in American states at the time.

https://billmoyers.com/story/hitler-america-nazi-race-law/

[–] tristan@aussie.zone 11 points 7 months ago

Not just interviewing Hitler, but only asking the questions Hitler wanted, and then urging the world to listen because everybody needs to hear his side

[–] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Comparing Putin with Hitler is a form of Nazi apologia

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Someone post that article about how comparing communism to nazism is antisemitism. It's really good.

EDIT: I know Russia isn't communist but you'd be easily mistaken with how liberals talk about them.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago

Just so we're clear here, what you're suggesting that engaging in wars of aggression automatically equates the country with the nazi Germany?

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

!askhistorians@lemmy.world

!askhistorians@lemmygrad.ml

might be a better place to ask your question. This is a thread about something else. Wiegand would be the obvious one tho.