this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
249 points (98.8% liked)

World News

31870 readers
471 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 81 points 6 months ago (12 children)

like i don't give a shit about tuck but in what reality is simply talking to the "enemy" some kind of punishable offense. y'all supposed to be all about free press, are they not free to speak to bad people?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 56 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

Why does the page have a “fairness” feedback meter, and how is enlightened centrism “factual and fair”?

[–] somename@hexbear.net 64 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The more opinions you have the more biased you are, thus sitting on your ass and accepting the status quo is the purest form of thinking possible.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 30 points 6 months ago
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 27 points 6 months ago

Because question-begging centrism is all that any of these really are

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Freedom of the press and protection of journalists in the West. If he went to talk to Netanyahu no one would have minded.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 36 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Too true. Our Media publishes all of Israels lies on the front page with a tiny quote that attributes it to the IDF.

They repeat those lies over multiple articles. And they keep quoting those lies. Over and over.

But one interview with Putin is a line too far...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 34 points 6 months ago

Tucker Carlson is a fascist prick but this is ridiculous. He interviewed a guy and made it public. He did basic journalism. It might not be good journalism and it might be biased against the official party line but it is not like he has shot up an Ukrainian orphanage or something.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Tucker spouting white supremacist homophobic transphobic speech

EU sleeps

Tucker flies to the EU or Russia to talk to another right winger about the weather or some shit

EU freak out

Really lets you know what their priorities are.

[–] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 6 months ago

By EU standards, Putin is basically a centrist..

[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

If Assange and Snowden can't come back, why cucker?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (20 children)

It's wild to me how many allegedly left-leaning or "liberal" people who say they believe in open societies, free expression, etc will gladly throw all that out the window if it means they get to punish somebody they disagree with. This trend has really picked up the last 10 years or so. Fuck tucker carlson but he has a right to speak freely and it's terrifying that the government can sanction a journalist, even a shitty one, for the crime of interviewing somebody.

Jailing or sanctioning journalists and critics is some shit Putin and other despots do, let's not emulate him. I would stand with anybody who is sanctioned by the government for their speech regardless of how much I disagree with it.

Societies which stifle dissent, especially using the power of the state, grow weaker because they aren't able to effectively adapt to change. Remember it is not too long ago that advocating for gay marriage would have been seen as morally deviant and repugnant. But strong speech protections allow us as a society to have that discussion and come to the correct conclusion which is that it's fine to be gay, that love is love, and that gay people deserve equal protection under the law.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Jailing or sanctioning journalists and critics is some shit Putin and other despots do, let's not emulate him.

Let's not pretend that whichever western states are included in "us" here aren't similarly despotic. It makes little difference whether you kill the journalist yourself or have a dog like Israel do it and then cover for them.

I would stand with anybody who is sanctioned by the government for their speech regardless of how much I disagree with it.

Hate speech is bad and dying on the hill that people should be able to advocate for genocide is nothing but useful idiocy for fascists.

None of this is especially relevant to the particulars of this case, obviously Putin has mostly rather banal things to say, because it's either a: correct, b: wretchedly chauvinist in a way that Republicans agree with (e.g. homophobia), or c: that weird revanchist shit that doesn't mean anything. I just think your ideology is intellectually and practically suicidal and wanted to comment on part of it.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah Tucker should have been thrown off the air years ago for hate speech, not just talking to a Russian. Talking to Putin is nothing compared to the years of transphobic racist drivel he's spewed. It's such a clear bias in what free press in America actually entails.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Dude spouted great replacement theory on his fucking show! Any government or party serious about stopping fascism would have jailed him over that

[–] Zuzak@hexbear.net 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

I agree with you in part, but:

Societies which stifle dissent, especially using the power of the state, grow weaker because they aren't able to effectively adapt to change. Remember it is not too long ago that advocating for gay marriage would have been seen as morally deviant and repugnant. But strong speech protections allow us as a society to have that discussion and come to the correct conclusion which is that it's fine to be gay, that love is love, and that gay people deserve equal protection under the law.

Free speech is also allowing a massive, astroturfed campaign to spread transphobia. The people with the most money have the loudest voices, and printing sensationalist bigotry to provoke fear, anger, and hate gets the clicks which makes more money.

What makes it especially terrifying, and I'm speaking from personal experience, is that you don't know who's on the other side of the screen. Most people in the target audience will just get a little pissy and keep clicking headlines (and voting to take away rights), but there's also people who are unstable, whether due to drugs or psychological issues or simply being too deep into the narrative. When you have for example far-right media outlets saying trans people are pedophiles, and more mainstream sources validating that perspective in not so many words, and that's being broadcast to some meth head watching hours on end every day, then I'm not really a fan of that speech being free.

Just last weekend, for instance, some queer friends and I were threatened by an unstable person with a metal pipe just walking down the street, idk how much the media plays into that but I also had a family member who did what I described above, shooting up meth and watching shit like OAN all day every day. And even regular people who watch too much cable news, and it doesn't even matter that much what they watch, if you try to reason with them, no matter how much sense you make or what facts you have on your side, it's one conversation vs all the time they've spent watching the news - I like to compare it to trying to win an argument when the other side gets to say 100 words (or more) every time you say 1. In this way, good ideas don't always win in the marketplace of ideas.

But yeah I agree with your overall point, sanctioning someone for interviewing a world leader is some bullshit, fuck Tucker Carlson but it's always important to understand rival geopolitical powers.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] What_Religion_R_They@hexbear.net 26 points 6 months ago

I know this is obvious but it's so disheartening seeing the right monopolizing aspects of communist rhetoric just due to the amount of capital giving it a massive platform.

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 22 points 6 months ago

Eagerly awaiting the EU to sanction all US aligned propagandists as well...

Oh wait that will never happen

[–] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think it’s so funny people are having long debates in this comment section and it’s essentially just saying a wealthy guy may or may not be able to fly to the EU because he did something.

Literally nothing has happened and I gotta read 87 paragraphs about whether I should be a free speech absolutist or not,

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 19 points 6 months ago

I like that people are having the discussion, I also like that I skipped it.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 months ago (10 children)

the sheer hysteria over this is equal parts hilarious and revealing

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

#BlueAnon report:

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: smells like russian troll

[–] somename@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago

Rookie mistake. I always take a shower before posting.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 months ago
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] tree@lemmy.zip 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I doubt anything will come of this, it's just an interview, probably just some big talk from people in EU parliament, I guess Russia did the exact same thing when they sanctioned Sean Penn and Ben Stiller, but I would be surprised if the EU stoops to that level, it's frankly petty to target private citizens doing media stuff regardless of what it is or how much you disagree with it.

https://thehill.com/policy/international/3629942-russia-sanctions-25-more-americans-including-us-officials-and-actors/

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 21 points 6 months ago

but I would be surprised if the EU stoops to that level, it's frankly petty to target private citizens doing media stuff regardless of what it is or how much you disagree with it.

"Am I a joke to you?"

  • Jullian Assange
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago
[–] RoseTintedGlasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

[I got a bot to automatically delete all my comments over 1 month old so you can’t see this comment anymore]

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›