this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
2989 points (99.9% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2406 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has been charged by the Department of Justice with the following four counts:

  • A conspiracy to defraud the United States “by using dishonesty, fraud and deceit to obstruct the nation’s process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election,” according to the special counsel’s office.

  • A conspiracy to impede the Jan. 6 congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified.

  • A conspiracy against the right to vote and to have that vote counted.

  • Obstruction of, and attempt to obstruct and impede, the certification of the electoral vote.


In criminally charging former president Donald Trump for his efforts to reverse his 2020 election loss, federal prosecutors allege that Trump enlisted six co-conspirators to “assist him in his criminal efforts to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election and retain power.”

  1. Rudy Giuliani

  2. John Eastman

  3. Sidney Powell

  4. Jeffrey Clark

  5. Kenneth Chesebro

  6. Unknown political consultant


Updated 8/3/2023 by Jordan Lund

Washington, D.C. - 4 felonies, January 6th Election Interference

Investigation

Indictment

Arrest <- You Are Here

(Lawyers have until 8/10 to submit requested trial dates, which will be announced on 8/28)

Trial

Conviction

Sentencing

Georgia - Election Interference

Investigation <- You Are Here

2 new grand juries were impaneled on 7/11/2023.

Indictment - July 11th to September 1st.

(Grand Jury work expected July 31 to Aug. 18)

Arrest

Trial

Conviction

Sentencing

New York State - 34 felonies, Stormy Daniels Payoff

Investigation

Indictment

Arrest <- You Are Here

Trial - March 25th, 2024

Conviction

Sentencing

Florida - 40 felonies, Federal documents charges

Investigation

Indictment

The original indictment was for 37 felonies.

3 new felonies were added on July 27, 2023.

Arrest <- You Are Here

Trial - May 20, 2024

Conviction

Sentencing


Other grand juries, such as for the documents at Bedminster, have not been announced.

The E. Jean Carroll trial for sexual assault and defamation, where Trump was found liable and ordered to pay $5 million before immediately defaming her again, resulting in a demand for $10 million, is not listed as it’s a civil case and not a criminal one.


Sources:


Trumps 3rd Indictment - Conspiring to Defraud the United States - 1 August 2023

NBC News: Grand jury charges Trump in 2020 election probe: Highlights

Vox: Trump was just indicted for trying to steal the 2020 election

CNN: August 1, 2023 Trump indicted in special counsel's 2020 election interference probe

Washington Post: Here are the Trump co-conspirators described in the DOJ indictment

Reason: Trump Indicted for Attempting To Overturn 2020 Presidential Election

FiveThirtyEight: All Of Trump's Indictments Could Seriously Bog Down His Campaign


Trump's Arraignment - 3 August 2023

AP: Trump is due to face a judge in DC over charges he tried to overturn the 2020 presidential election

C-SPAN: The Not Above the Law Coalition, a group of organizations in support of accountability for those who opposed certifying the 2020 election results, holds a press conference ahead of the arraignment of former President Donald Trump.

C-SPAN: Coverage of the arraignment of former President Trump, stemming from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into election interference. The former president is facing four criminal charges, including conspiracy to defraud the United States.

CBS News: Trump pleads not guilty to federal charges in special counsel probe

Chicago Tribune: Trump pleads not guilty to federal charges that he tried to overturn the 2020 election

The Independent: Trump appears to stumble over his name and age at arraignment


Official Documentation

Read the indictment by @mateomaui@reddthat.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skyler@kbin.social 311 points 1 year ago (10 children)

There's a very legitimate chance that Donald Trump could be convicted in multiple cases of multiple crimes and still win the presidency.

The implications of that are terrifying.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 124 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Welp, better get all the zoomers registered to vote.

[–] TokenGingerGuy@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While I agree with this so much, every election we say that. And it never pans out

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Actually, in the last 3 elections younger voters have turned out in historic records.

2018, 2020, 2022 were the highest 18-29 participation in over 30 years.

Edit:

Related article:

https://archive.ph/2023.07.21-052839/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/07/19/gen-z-voters-2024/

[–] OctopusKurwa@lemm.ee 78 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gen Z turnout was so effective in the 2022 midterms that many republicans have proposed raising the voting age.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I was reading about Vivek Ramaswamy on his Wikipedia page last night and I saw that he's seriously pushing raising the voting age to 25! What a bunch of absolute fascist shitheads. Trying to steal the right to vote from voters that disagree with them. Literally doing the thing they accuse Democrats of doing. It's the same old bullshit hypocrisy with those fuckfaces. I wish it still surprised me. How anybody could possibly support them at this point is beyond me. They've become a joke and nothing more at this point. I wish there was a serious opposition to the Democratic Party. It's not good to have only one sane party in a country. You want your party's ideas to be forged in the fire of scrutiny that comes with serious political conversations. But what Republicans have become is useless. At this point I can't wait for them to just fucking die as a party. Wipe them out so badly that a new party has to rise in their stead. And God I hope it looks nothing like the modern conservative bullshit ideology.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago

Literally doing the thing they accuse Democrats of doing.

Every accusation from them is a confession. I'm not aware of a single exception.

[–] _CottonCandyUnicorn_@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn. Realizing this next election will be my first where I won't be considered a "young" voter anymore. 👨‍🦳

[–] Ado@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the party, pal

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, voting has never worked at probably any level for Zoomers. In Austin the state even overturned local ordinances that passed. It is so fucking hopeless

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 91 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His supporters have been groomed (ahem) to think it’s all fake. From something I saw recently, 91% of Republicans don’t believe he has committed federal crimes.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 66 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It was a smaller percentage than that. What’s terrifying is that the percentage of people who support him is higher than the percentage of those who think he committed crimes.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/01/us/politics/trump-republicans-poll-crimes.html#

This article states that 17% of voters who support him over Biden admit he committed crimes, but still support him.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Who could be surprised, really. Republicans are traitors.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

And yet they're also the ones who would never support letting convicts vote... And probably would never support someone else who had committed a crime becoming president...

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read that on this link. Is it accurate? idk. oh, i see now it says 'fox news viewers', but that's not really a different group, is it?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/whopping-91-of-fox-news-viewers-believe-trump-has-not-committed-federal-crimes-but-only-42-support-him-in-the-primary/ar-AA1eBAm1

[–] Byundai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Well, that is to be expected when you consider that most Republicans are Christian. When your religion goes against the trans movement and pedophilia, it would be rather hard to go for anyone else.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

Are you actually equating trans people with pedophilia right now? Absolutely unbelievable. Go outside.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

what the fucking hell of fuck does that mean?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are saying that if you're against pedophilia you need to vote Republican... Yeah...

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

And apparently that being trans is somehow related to being a child molester, which is one of the more fucked up things the right has been pushing recently.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remind me again what Jesus had to say about trans people...

People make bigotry their religion and justify it by saying they have to be bigots because they're Christians, but the existence of Christians who aren't bigots shows they're lying, as does even a cursory examination of what their holy book actually requires of them.

[–] Byundai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know what Jesus said since I'm not a Christian. Afaik he never said anything about trans people. The belief of Christians that I personally know has been that the trans ideology goes completely against the Bible's teachings.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Those Christians are jumping on a hateful bandwagon, there. Nothing in the bible talks about trans people in any negative light. Hell, even the anti-gay rhetoric was a translation "error" changing the word "pedophiles" to "homosexuals" deliberately in the 1940s..

[–] Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

And an equal chance he'll lose a 3rd popular vote and still have a chance of becoming president. We need to reform or straight out abolish the electoral college.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think he’d have a chance. His margins on the first win were razor thin and you can bet Dems would be out in droves to stop it.

That said, don’t take it for granted! Go out and vote dammit!

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You say that but the last election came down to what? 40k humans in Wisconsin?
Sure Biden will probably wipe the floor with the popular vote, but the electoral college seems to favour the GOP

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

That’s my point, he had razor thin margins on many electoral college votes. It sure as hell wasn’t close on the popular vote, after all

[–] bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

South Africa would like to have a word... This is exactly what happened with Jacob Zuma. Thankfully not in a country that's a world superpower though... 😳

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not long after Trevor Noah took over the Daily Show, he ran this Segment about America's First African President which absolutely stuck with me for quite a while

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/2FPrJxTvgdQ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

What a legend. Trevor Noah is a national treasure!

[–] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not really the jan 6 case would legally bar him from running in any state or federal election

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does it have to conclude before 2024?

[–] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They might be able to get him to take a plea deal sense he's only running not to go to jail drop all charges except the one barring him from running again

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

They might be able to get him to take a plea deal sense he's only running not to go to jail drop all charges except the one barring him from running again

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is in reference to the 14th amendment, right? Assuming that he's convicted before the election, how would that be enforced? Say New York refuses to put him on the ballot and SCOTUS says that they can't do that. What would happen then?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's no "enforcing" it. He simply isn't the president, no matter what. If people working in the executive branch choose to obey a fake president instead of the real one, that's called a coup, and if it succeeds, the United States as we know it will no longer exist because it will be clear to everyone that the Constitution is no longer the law of the land.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

And people are proud to live here….

[–] Scuzzlebutt@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can he be on a federal ballot as a felon?

[–] Sluggles@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Felons can be elected president, but in most cases, cannot vote in the presidential election. Because, America... I guess.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He disqualified himself under the Fourteenth Amendment the moment he sent goons to attack Congress. As such, no state should list him on a ballot; he's not a valid candidate.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The legal question is does the Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment apply prior to conviction in Federal Court. Second, Congress can vote to ignore it with a 2/3 vote in the House.

load more comments (1 replies)