Working-age US adults are dying at far higher rates than their peers from high-income countries, even surpassing death rates in Central and Eastern European countries, and midlife mortality rates in the UK are not great either. A new study has examined what's caused this rise in the death rates of these two cultural superpowers.
Life expectancy started to rise around 1840 at a pace of almost 2.5 years per decade and has continued to the present day. A 2021 study calculated that if the current pace continues, most children born this millennium will live to celebrate their 100th birthday. However, new research by the Leverhulme Center for Demographic Science (LCDS) at the University of Oxford and Princeton University has revealed some troubling trends for those in midlife, particularly in the US and the UK.
“Over the past three decades, midlife mortality in the US has worsened significantly compared to other high-income countries, and for the younger 20- to 44-year-old age group, in 2019, it even surpassed midlife mortality rates for Central and Eastern European countries,” said Katarzyna Doniec, the study’s corresponding author. “This is surprising, given that not so long ago, some of these countries experienced high levels of working-age mortality, resulting from the post-socialist [economic] crisis of the 1990s.”
…
The study demonstrates that most countries have experienced declines in all-cause mortality over the three decades to 2019. The notable exception is the United States, whose divergence from comparable high-income countries in age-standardized mortality rates of 25- to 64-year-olds has accelerated over time. Strikingly, for US females aged 25 to 44, all-cause mortality rates were higher in 2019 than in 1990. The country’s higher mortality was especially noticeable when it came to preventable deaths: homicides, deaths from transport accidents, and so-called ‘deaths of despair’ related to suicide and alcohol and drug use.
"Deaths of despair."
It's a subtle thing. I like to browse bookstores and libraries. It used to be if I engaged someone in small talk we'd have a pleasant little chat about books. These days, the only people who want to chat are the employees.
As an introvert, I love this. Please leave me alone and let me browse. I don't wanna talk about what I'm reading/interested in, I don't care about your 5 cats at home, and I really don't wanna hear about what you like.
Do you talk to people in the park? In the grocery? The point is that those little chats actually do a lot for people's mental health.
If people say "hi"to me in passing, yes I will smile and say hi back, I'm not going to completely ignore people. Other than that, I just wanna be left alone.
https://www.sciencealert.com/isolation-has-profound-effects-on-the-human-body-and-brain-here-s-what-happens
Isolating is just not healthy.
I think you're confusing not enjoying small talk with isolation
Doesn’t really sound like isolation, though. Unless they are a hermit. But then they wouldn’t see a person to begin with.
The information should be out there.
Half the posts I see here talk about having 'social anxiety.'
People need to make the effort to get into conversations that aren't on screen.
I have AuDHD that wasn't diagnosed until I was 61. My whole life most of my brain has been used to study people, their reactions, and beat myself up for failing to act/react to them in a socially-acceptable way.
I've had 4 major existential crashes (and more smaller ones) in my life where I stay alone almost constantly ... mostly because I can't handle having to give my whole self to people, all of the time, so they don't see me as a freak.
The hell EVERYONE should do what you think we should do 'cause you are a know-it-all.
I bet they're the kinda person that waves to get someone's attention when they've got headphones on just so they can ask what they're listening to 🙄
I don't want to make the effort because it is not enjoyable to me. Conversations "on a screen" aren't invalid just because you prefer to socialize in person.
No they fucking don't. People aren't obligated to entertain you just because you feel lonely
No, they do a lot for your mental health. They just stress me out. If I want to chat I'll go chat with someone I know. I do not enjoy random people talking to me at all
Reminds me of all the extroverts wanting WFH to end. “I want to hear the latest gossip and enjoy the office culture!”
You mean you want a captive audience that can do nothing about your incessant cat stories that no one else wants to hear, and ruin the productivity of the entire office.
“But our mental health!”, yeah no. Everyone else is doing much better without you and the cat stories. We want to get our work done and then read/go for a walk.
I have so much hate in my heart for those people lmao
Id love a chat but I'm also very socially anxious in public.
Beware of recursive patterns.
I'm anxious so I don't socialize which reinforces anxiety so I don't socialize which..
The mind can spiral in on itself and this can be difficult to recognize.
Or in short, always being comfortable is bad for your long-term health. Discomfort provides a great deal of value in the context of mental well-being.
You only get over stuff by doing them. I don't expect everyone I talk to to be utterly fascinating; I just want to know if you've read a particular author.
"Excuse me, do you have a moment to talk about our Lord and Savior Ayn Rand?"
(Slaps knee) “wheeeellllppppp!”
Never coming here again