this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
78 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22846 readers
163 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DigitalDruid@lemmy.sdf.org 59 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

the bridge is coming up on 50 years old. maryland DOT regulations require a safety certification inspection every 5 years but every 50 they get a really thorough inspection where they use radar and sonar to check the concrete foundation pilings.

When the FSK was built back in the 70's the mob was doing big business in ports all up and down the eastern seaboard and it's widely known in charm city that the bridge was made with shady mob concrete and was done really shoddily. There is zero chance that bridge was going to pass its 50 year inspection and the owner was going to be absolutely fucked and probably do an entire retrofit.

It just so happens that the bridge changed hands last year to what looks like a shell company at a discount and as part of that transfer the insurance policy was updated and increased (which is normal) but the inspection reports the insurance company uses are the 5 year reports which don't do the deep concrete scans.

And it also just so happens that the ship that hit the bridge was used in an insurance fraud scheme a few years ago where they sideswiped a pier in europe. It ended up that the mafia was involved in that, too.

I have no proof of anything shady but when you look at all the pieces...

[–] someone@hexbear.net 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It just so happens that the bridge changed hands last year to what looks like a shell company at a discount

Okay, let's pause there. Why is a major bridge in the hands of a private owner?

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)

uhhhhhh

The private sector owns the vast majority of the Nation’s critical infrastructure and key resources—roughly 85 percent. However, the government historically has funded the construction and maintenance of certain infrastructure sectors (e.g. transportation and water infrastructure).

Over a third of the Nation’s dams are fifty years old, a number that will increase to nearly 70 percent in ten years. In addition, bridges are generally designed to last 50 years, and the average bridge in the United States is 43 years old

paper written in 2011

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 26 points 9 months ago

However, the government historically has funded the construction and maintenance of certain infrastructure sectors

Capitalism has the most effective allocation of resources - We do like the commies and then give the things away to ~~noblemen~~ entrepreneurs

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 31 points 9 months ago

That sounds more plausible to me than conspiracy-y.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 13 points 9 months ago