this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
173 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5127 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] 99shugz@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Someone get this man into the White House!

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For the proletariat, right?!??

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

They would nickname me Robin Hood, prince of the guillotine

[–] MacNCheezus -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's racist against black folks

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] MacNCheezus 4 points 6 months ago

Menthol cigarettes are purchased disproportionately by African-American smokers, with 80% of African-American smokers consuming menthol cigarettes primarily.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menthol_cigarette

Is Wikipedia racist?

Are facts racist?

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

They know, they’re a racist.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's just a ban with extra steps.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No. And, that cliche wordplay doesn’t apply here. A ban would be many more steps, including enforcement. A tax is one step.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ratcheting up tax until no one can afford it is a ban with a lot of steps

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Folks, you heard it here first.

Housing has officially been banned!

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, literally. I live in California and here we talk about "effective bans" on new housing quite a bit. No, it's not a straightforward ban, but it's so many permits and taxes and requirements that it's an effective ban (although zoning is a straightforward ban).

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That’s why I can’t drive anymore.

By requiring a license they’ve banned driving.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hypothetically, if the cost of a license was prohibitive, sure.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Any amount is prohibitive to some, so I guess groceries are banned now too.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In a functioning state, those who can't afford groceries get them free, so no. Also, that's companies setting the prices, not government.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I just hear free steaks now.

Yum.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

It's nice not having to worry about food