this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
771 points (96.4% liked)

memes

10149 readers
2352 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 86 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I love all the long waiting and useless messages that comes with it, too.

  • Preparing to download.
  • Downloading. useless progress percentage
  • Preparing to install.
  • Installing. more useless progress percentage
  • Please do not turn off your computer.
  • "Hi".
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 46 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Don’t forget when the update stage actually reads 100%, which makes no logical sense because if the stage was at 100%, you wouldn’t still be telling me we are processing it as the current stage.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Somehow Windows struggles with file i/o and always has been. When copying stuff to floppy disks in Win 3 or 95 the progress bar steadily grew to 100% and since floppies were loud, you could hear that the actual copying only started then and you had to wait longer staring at 100% than the progress bar before.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You just gave me a nostalgia bomb of copying files on Win98/XP and watching the little files fly from one folder to the other for 5 minutes after the progress bar filled up.

I miss little animations like that, makes me wish there were more fun little things in OS UIs these days. Now everything is just a bar and a number.

[–] Napain@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

watching the little files fly wasn't it pieces of paper?

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It’s been a minute, man. I haven’t used WinXP since 2009

[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Yup that one really pisses me off.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

meanwhile updates on linux telling me exactly what is happening in real time, working completely in the background, and politely informing me that i may wish to reboot to apply all the updates properly

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Windows: Imma let you finish but first we gotta update my man. Will only take an hour. Maybe three.

Linux: Save the drama for your mamma.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Linux updates are much superior, but Windows updates have not taken more than 5 minutes for me for a long time.

I just hate all the reboots. Linux can update everything, even kernels now, and no downtime. Reminds me of crap home internet routers: "oh you changed the date&time? Then I gotta reboot"

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The routine Windows updates do go pretty quickly, but the "cumulative updates" can still take a very long time in my experience. I have to patch multiple servers and workstations at my job and it sucks. And if you have a hyper-v guest that lies dormant most of the time, but you need to update it once or twice a month, may the gods help you. Takes forever to even CHECK for updates, because Windows freaks the hell out if your PC remains turned off for a period of time.

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago

Then,

-Please try Edge