this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
800 points (74.9% liked)

memes

10408 readers
1811 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"b-but bears are actually dangerous!" Shut the hell up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mydude@lemmy.world 197 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

People's safety is more important than people's feelings.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 107 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Indeed. It strikes me as pointlessly gendered. All people, safety is more important than feelings.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 66 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The whole thing was meant to be rage bait.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 23 points 6 months ago (2 children)

or it's purposefully gendered in response to the man vs bear thing

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 months ago

Which is also rage bait

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah this meme as well as the original bear one were meant to be divisive and make people angry. That's the point of these kinds of memes, they're not really meant to be intelligent, they're meant to stir up drama and make people fight.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

~~you know what else is pointlessly gendered? the patriarchy~~

feminist messaging has to be gendered because the patriarchy is a gender issue.

that said, feminism is for everybody. liberating women from oppressive structures by nature does the same for men.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If it’s not gendered and is for everybody, that isn’t that just the original statement? That safety is for everybody? That seems rather circular.

But I think I get what you’re saying. We focus on lifting up women, and everyone benefits.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

yeah i see how my comment was a little confusing let me try to edit :p thanks for the good faith question tho

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago

Hey no worries. More people should act in good faith in my opinion. We don’t even have to agree with everyone but we should have mutual respect for each other and want a better world.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If this weren't gendered I'm not sure I would connect that this was posted as result of people's reaction to the bears vs men thing.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 6 months ago

Ah, good point! None of us would be here in that case.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 24 points 6 months ago (3 children)

That gives me feelings of "All lives matter" which minimized the issues of black people. Can you explain why this is different?

[–] Doof@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Except one has built in meaning and the other is a simple meme made by one person with an oversimplified idea used likely to stir up people considering all the discussions happening about bears or whatever.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Doof@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It's disingenuous all the way down

[–] mydude@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

BLM, no sarcasm.

this statement is funny to me, because linguistically, safety is a relatively "felt" concept. We "feel" exposed in a massive open field, and we "feel" safe inside of a building, because we are no longer exposed in a massive wide open field.

In some aspects, physical safety is a thing, but given the context of this thread here, i think it's probably appropriate to say that it's actually the feeling of safety here, that matters more than anything. And as a result, this makes the statement a non starter.

Because to some degree, that feeling of safety, is based on well... Feelings, and if feelings are somehow less important than the safety that those feelings are capable of deriving, than how are you supposed to experience safety?

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Are you really all lives mattering this post rn? God damn dude. I hope every person in your life belittles every problem you personally have by telling you that tons of people have that problem.

[–] mydude@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago

BLM, no sarcasm.