this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
2319 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

11205 readers
1483 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bruhh@lemmy.world 164 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If I remember correctly, it wasn't even illegal since these scientific articles should have been public to begin with because they used public funds.

[–] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 79 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

That may be so, but IIRC he was charged with breaking into MIT's networking room and illegally tapping into their network to get the articles:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2261840/Aaron-Swartz-MIT-surveillance-shot-ruined-tragic-Reddit-founders-life.html

[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That also may be so, but 35 years is fucked up for that. pretty sure child porn first time offenders is like 15 to 30 so hacking MIT for stuff that should have been free gets you more jail time then a first CP offence. OK thats fucked up

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago

Assuming this is actually by the guy, here is what the linked article says about child porn:

In the US, it is illegal to possess or distribute child pornography, apparently because doing so will encourage people to sexually abuse children.

This is absurd logic. Child pornography is not necessarily abuse. Even if it was, preventing the distribution or posession of the evidence won't make the abuse go away. We don't arrest everyone with videotapes of murders, or make it illegal for TV stations to show people being killed.

Wired has an article on how these laws destroy honest people's lives.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Child pornography is not necessarily abuse.

Yikes.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

An image of an event is not the event. That's the reasoning there. There's some sense of logic there, though the knowledge their abuse is used by pedophiles can absolutely be a continuing trauma for the victims.

[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 months ago

OK a reason to not like him but sending him to prison for his views that he didnt act on sounds like fasicm lol I dont agree with his views just saying

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Well that's definitely burying the lede from the OP.

It wasn't the sharing part they had a problem with, it was the B&E and hacking.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 63 points 6 months ago (1 children)

still... 35 years? obviously there is more missing information.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 0 points 6 months ago

It wasn't 35 years, it was 6 months with a plea deal

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's not that clear cut and I would recommend listening to the Behind The Bastards episode about him:

Behind the Bastards: Part One: Christmas Hero Episode: Aaron Swartz

https://omny.fm/shows/behind-the-bastards/part-one-christmas-hero-episode-aaron-swartz

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Most of these guys they just offer jobs to. This was needless. No wonder China is kicking our ass on the cyber front

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The whole criminals getting job offers has never been true and will never be true. For many of such jobs you aren't qualified if you have a criminal record, even small offenses disqualify you.

[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 months ago

I mean thousands of war criminals were offered jobs after ww2 so I doubt they would care about a little red tape just hire them into the black no one needs to know

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip

[–] el_abuelo@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago

Ah my sweet summer child...how wonderful it must be to live in your world.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

That's still a hell of a sentence for a B&E

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Mm. Breaking and entering to share publicly funded research is different than B&E with the threat of violence...

[–] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 6 months ago

I hacked my highschool servers when I was young and shared the upcoming exams, so everyone could prepare for them. Someone told the authorities, all I got was some extra exercise. Sure it wasn't MIT, but still 35 years is ridiculous, even a year of prison would have been ridiculous.

[–] ivofcups@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Paradoxically, that's not how science jourals work. There are no difference between public or prívate funds in this regard.