304
Trump demands drug test for Biden ahead of first debate
(thehill.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
304 points (92.5% liked)
Not The Onion
11066 readers
166 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Remember back in 2016 when Trump challenged Bernie Sanders to a debate? Bernie said sure and Trump had to walk it back.
The last thing Trump and his people wants it to have to have him stand up in an uncontrolled setting.
I'll be amazed if these debates happen.
Do the debates, and reveal the results of the drug test (taken by both candidates) DURING the debate. Let's do this shit like Maury.
Can Maury reveal it as well?? I would actually watch it then!
Can Maury moderate it? Bring in some family members before they reveal the test results, maybe some videos played to tell us a bit more about them
Perfect. And throw in a few surprise paternity tests at the same time
I’m sure he has at least a dozen illegitimate kids.
The best would be if he actually wasn't Baron's father...turns out Melania had a side piece, too.
Oh I meant like several dozen women come out with his illegitimate heirs, but that’d actually be pretty fuckin hilarious.
Hold on, we don't want him getting aroused.
I hate this but honestly it's the most truly American way to handle it so I say go for it.
It's literally a choice between status quo, or the last election in America. If it's sunk, that is more a result of you then anything the entire Democrat party can do.
I think you meant than.
So... to be clear... your response to someone saying that Democrats are fucking up by thinking "but have you seen him?"... is to double down on "but but but, have you seen him?!?!"
Trump needs to be in a prison, but this shit is directly how the DNC is continuing to shoot itself in the foot with a significant chunk of the population.
It was absolutely a smackdown. Trump is a complete moron and the media kept him in it.
And who won?
The popular vote? Hillary. The egregiously outdated and unfair electoral college vote? The bloated, corrupt rapist that is also a flailing and failing oligarch.
Don't forget fellating a failing oligarch, too.
What the 2 party system delivers?
I agree.
But cute sidestep on the question.
I endorse invalidating the 2 party system by not participating in the 2 party system and forcing reform.
You aparently want round 2, Genocidal Joe vs Always was that Trump, but expect a new result. Electric boogaloo.
I also won't vote for militarized police and genocide.
So there's that too.
And how do you plan to do that before shit turns bad?
You shouldn't just ignore elections as if they won't affect you. Unless you have a plan to fix it before the next one. So what's your plan?
I dont. Shits already bad.
Not ignoring it. Awarely and consciously abstaining.
So, you're doing absolutely nothing except consciously support the rapist fuck who wants to sell out the whole country to Russia? Gotcha.
That was always the case all along. Don’t believe them when they tell you they are trying to change the system. They are as status quo as it gets.
Well folks, I've got some news. Melkath didn't vote. There's only one course now. Electoral College? Scrapped! FPTP voting? Scrapped! Two Party System? Scrapped!
As long as at least 1 other person in the country is still voting, "not voting" will never invalidate the system. There's no quorum that has to be met. If only 7 ballots get cast in your state, then all the votes go to the guy that got 4. All you've done by refusing to participate is give the make the other voices louder.
You get no argument from me! 100% agree. I'm as frustrated as anyone that this is the case, but it is. Maybe everyone has to have their one "reform" vote lesson. I voted for Nader once. I still get a hard time for that from some people.
Show me an example in history where doing nothing brought desired change.
Just ONE example.