this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
328 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39102 readers
3756 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The court is the highest UN body for hearing disputes between states. Its rulings are final and binding but have been ignored in the past, reports Reuters. The court has no enforcement powers.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

And that's by design by the Big 5.

Just like their veto power at the Security Council making sure that they don't even get to condemn atrocities officially.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's less of a court in the traditional sense, and more of an indicator and shaper of international sentiment.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Still useless though. International sentiment was pretty clear even before this

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Was it? Look at Germany or the rest of the EU for example. It would make it much easier to argue for divestments and sanctions in parliaments if there was an active warrant against Bibi.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I guess i meant civilian sentiment and not political sentiment. It seems like there is a gap between these, in this case

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago

I don't know how accurate it is, but I seem to see the Right Wing Cinematic Universe being on Israel's side internationally.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Yeah, it's definitely not going to be enforced but it's still breaking the Genocide Convention. It basically says that in the future Israel might not comply with international treaties if it doesn't feel like it. This makes them hard to work with as a country.

Then there is also bilateral actions such as sanctions as a tool to put pressure.