320
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

You’re saying that people voting for Biden are defending genocidal presidents. I find it appalling that you would say this about people who actually have family suffering in Gaza.

Again, why would I temper my criticism based on some likely-imaginary conversation you had. You know what's actually apalling? Supporting candidates who fund a genocide. You don't get to pretend to be scandalized and appalled by anything given the party politics you're supporting.

If your totally not made up person that you definitely talked to is going vote for Biden it is still a long-term mistake that makes Democratic support for genocide acceptable.

It's not acceptable and we have three choices as voters 1) Support Biden's full throated no-strings support of full speed genocide 2) Support Trump's full throated no-strings support of full speed genocide 3) Vote Uncommitted to communicate that Dems need to change their party politics around genocide support if they want to win elections.

Those are the choices, there is no "Biden will maybe change his mind once you reward him with power again and suddenly become less genocidal" choice, that's a fantasy.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Your reading comprehension is severely lacking.

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Your moral center is non-existent.

Unlike Biden I do have a red line. It's support from genocide, from any candidate. Full stop, do not pass Go, do not collect the lesser of two evils.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

This isn't about morality, I'm telling you that you can't fucking read or you don't care about reading.

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Yes. Supporting or not supporting genocide is about morality.

No. I won't be convinced to vote for any candidate who supports genocide. Ever. For moral reasons, and because voting for that candidate would mean I'm communicating that support for genocide is politically viable for me. I disagree that genocide support should be politically viable.

You may be ok with Democrats supporting genocide, that's your call. You can call it pragmatism if you want. It's still genocide, and you still support it by going out and voting for a politician who supports it.

this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
320 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18069 readers
3923 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS