this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
541 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2555 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 76 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (3 children)

That is up to the judiciary branch to decide. But I would not be lying if I'm split between actual jail, or community service with a suspended jail scentence.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 26 points 5 months ago

Community service would be hilarious

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Home confinement is always an option

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With an ankle monitor.. I'm sorry .. the schadenfreude is just too much to resist.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

House arrest with an ankle monitor might be the way to go. No way he obeys the rules, so it can be a stepping stone into convicting him of even more stuff! Lol

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Is there any way that he could be released for a few hours a day to go work with a cleanup crew to pick up trash by a highway somewhere?

:)

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Needs a come with a complete communication blackout, no internet, no unnaproved phone calls.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Really? Because of anybody could benefit from some years in prison, it would be Trump.

OTOH, Hitler spent time in prison, and look how he turned out.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hitler was also young. If Trump goes to prison, there's a good chance he dies there.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago

I can't stop giggling at the thought: 34 counts, each with a maximum 4 year penalty.

I know, I know... no judge is going to issue the maximum penalty on each of those counts, especially in this case. But a man can dream.

136 years. happy sigh

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Appeals court: “Hold my beer.”