this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13458 readers
787 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So many of these seem like shitposts this could practically just be a clickhole video

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Egon@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Wild that trump didn't suggest the pissgold towers. Of all of them the light towers are among the coolest, but the light pollution would make me sad - Incredible that they found a way to make the NYC night sky worse

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. The light pollution would be bad, but I just kind of assumed Manhattan was probably a lost cause when it comes to that.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah for sure, I was more thinking that two large beacons would probably manage to do even more damage to wildlife somehow

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is there even any wildlife in Manhatten at this point?

Pretty sure all that's left is rats and pigeons.

[–] sempersigh@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

Is there even any wildlife in Manhatten at this point?

Yes actually! Had this guy pose the other day by da union square

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I was thinking of things like migrating birds, ocean life and bugs. Lights can mess them up and I'm thinking that adding two large beacons would probably make it worse. It's already bad, but I'd imagine two massive beacons make the light pollution cover a larger area or intensify the current damage. I don't know though