this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
122 points (97.7% liked)

News

23311 readers
3660 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 38 points 4 months ago (4 children)

And THIS is why you vote for harm reduction every fucking year.

Yes, this has been part of a plan going back to even before reagan. But one fucking election of people whining that the wrong person won the primaries extra fucked the supreme court for the foreseeable future. And we have the same clowns trying to pull the same shit going into this Fall.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Hell, I never vote for anybody, I always vote against." -- W.C. Fields in a rare serious moment.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yeah. My father is a REAL piece of shit and said it in the context of "I hate that Bush" but it still sticks with me:

In primaries? Vote for who you like. When it is time for the real election? Vote for the platform you hate the least. Bare minimum, it gives you the right to bitch and moan come February. Because if you don't vote? You actively chose to not have a say in the government.

... well, you also may have been disenfranchised by a bunch of republican shitheads. But it is the thought that counts.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Bernie is the closest it comes to a politician I actually like and even he is to the right of me on some things, so I can't even vote for someone I like in a primary most of the time. The best I can do is the person I dislike least.

But I agree with you about the general. Vote to block the person that has the greatest chance of winning that you dislike the most. It's kind of a complicated calculus in some countries, but in the U.S., that means either a Democrat or a Republican because no one else is going to win.

So, even though I don't particularly like the Democrats, I vote for them anyway.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Its great that you liked Sanders. I... have very mixed feelings about him and mostly am angry at how much influence he pissed away.

But here is the thing? If you don't think you are being represented by the party? Then work with it. Even Sanders learned that after he spent most of his career actively dicking over the Democrats and it resulted in him becoming a household name.

Contact your local Democratic party. The Internet loves to paint them as bogeymen who actively hurt any good candidates and... some do. But the majority are the idealists who joined up because they gave a shit about Obama or Hilary or even Sanders. But they support the people who run because... they understand that the goal is harm reduction. Someone who gives a crap and is willing to do outreach work? You have a LOT of influence and can work on seeking out those candidates who DO represent you. And as you shift the local party, so too do you eventually shift the bigger party. Because as much as people hate ol' Genocidde Joe: he is ridiculously left of Clinton and, in some aspects, even Obama.

I am glad we got The Squad, even if they are sometimes idiots. But Sanders should have led to a mass shift in the party as a whole.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I wouldn't say I like him. As I said, he comes closest to a politician I like. There has never in my lifetime been a mainstream politician who didn't have at least a few policies I really was not a fan of. I realize I'm never going to get my pony, but that doesn't mean I'm going to automatically like the choices I'm given.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bernie wants to save capitalism from itself.

Should we really fight so hard to save a system that is okay with people being homeless, desperate, and exploited their entire lives?

Capitalism would never save you.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure what you're trying to tell me, but I'm not a big fan of capitalism...

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fight hard to get FPTP or deal with the constant abuse you sustain from the government. This mindset keeps both of these parties in power.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You do both.

I am not as focused on ranked choice as others (I very much argue we basically already have the outcome with the primary system) and would rather a focus on getting rid of the electoral college entirely to allow for a popular vote. It doesn't matter

What matters is making sure we have a country where we can push toward that in a few years. Since, especially in 2024, one candidate is outright talking about dismantling democracy entirely. And, because of 2016, we have a supreme court that is basically "what do republicans want us to do?" at any given moment.

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

I'm in Kansas so I just vote third party federally and against Brownback when he pops up then against every incumbent.

We're never going to stop fighting over the lesser of evils. We'll just keep sliding auth while arguing over minimal harm.

Dig me up when people decide to do something about it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Clinton earned her loss.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Since you seem very familiar with the shortcomings of First Past The Post voting, you probably would be interested to hear there are alternative electoral systems out there with no chance for a spoiler effect.

Alternative vote

Ranked choice voting

STAR voting

You should ask your representatives about electoral reform so we can fix this mathematical flaw in our voting system. Then no one would have to cast a "harm reduction vote". They would be free to vote for someone they feel best represents them, safe in the knowledge their vote would still count against those they don't want in office.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

I am less convinced that alternate voting models will make a significant difference (especially when we look at stuff like France actively unifying the left-leaning parties to fight fascism), but cool.

Unless you are going to implement that by early October, it isn't the topic at hand. The topic at hand is harm reduction and preserving human rights.