this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
842 points (97.4% liked)

Science Memes

10988 readers
1832 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 94 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It's pedantry for the sake of being right. They care more about winning than the actual argument.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is why I detest the concept and celebration of “technically correct”. No, it’s not the “best kind of correct”, it’s being an asshole.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

I mean, in the example you're responding to, many of the people aren't doing the "technically correct" answer of, "microbial life will continue".

They're just morons who heard, "life finds a way" and assume humans will be fine.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No, it’s not the “best kind of correct”, it’s being an asshole.

That's the joke, though.

The character being quoted, from Futurama, is usually insufferable and often miserable.

Edit: Interestingly, the character is also relatively well liked and generally appreciated by the rest of the Planet Express crew. It's a pretty nuanced quote, in context. It kind of says "You're not wrong, and your correction is arguably unnecessary and objectively objectionable, but we love you, anyway."

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I dunno, maybe. I mean, technically they were right but even when I agreed, and explained how while that’s correct it’s also beside the point, they didn’t like that either.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

It's like talking about powers and saying "The square of 4 is 16" and they'll bleat "Actually, a square is a shape" and you're trying to find a way to tell them that their contribution is absolutely worthless and irrelevant to the topic.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 4 months ago

It's not even pedantic. It's that same logic you could use to say killing a person does no harm to them because their body still exists afterward.