this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
31 points (97.0% liked)
askchapo
22845 readers
332 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Fuck are you on about? There is a really good reason management can't be union members. Your job depends on enforcing the interests of the bosses, if you side with the workers, you get fired and replaced with someone who doesn't. It's literally their job to enforce and maximize exploitation. If someone takes a management position cause it's a way to make a living, I wouldn't call them not a comrade, bi Ut they're on thinner ice. Saying it's necessary to have leftists in leadership positions is silly, the point is to not be led by our bosses or their underlings. If there's already a union, you don't need a manager on your side cause you can instead tell them to take a hike.
Managers are expected to do this when the time comes, but most parts of most management jobs aren't this. Hiring, training, scheduling, resolving (preferably foreseeing) issues, evaluation -- all of this stuff happens in workplaces in AES states, too. Having a manager who at least tries to do those things competently and fairly can be a huge plus for the day-to-day lives of workers.
As for what one does when the bosses call on you to enforce their will? First, you can use your position to frustrate that will, as @CyberSyndicalist@hexbear.net points out. Second, maybe you have to make them fire you at some point -- everyone should have lines they won't cross.
Fully horizontal workplaces can work in some industries, but others (classically, a ship) really do need some people to make decisions and others to follow them. I'd rather look at ideas like democratizing workplaces and electing managers than take the line that managers (even ones chosen by workers) just aren't necessary.
Who benefits from OP staying put? This is a huge meatball right across the plate for everyone in the union to have a sleeper cell in an actual management position. If OP doesn't do it, the union going to get more of the same. If they hire someone from outside the department or company, it will almost certainly be much worse for everyone except upper management.
Also, don't be quick to assume OP would be found out so quickly by the rest of management, I've been doing this for years now - upper management thinks I'm great and one of their buddies, meanwhile I let my team take random days off without using up PTO, arrive late and leave early without question, etc. The work still gets done and no one gives it a second thought. If you're a professional bullshitter and/or your own boss isn't a micromanager, it's very possible to make a lot of good people's lives much less miserable by going this route.