this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
337 points (94.5% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 39 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Uh and what has changed for the muskrat to suddenly grow a smidge of conscious? That trump may loose and he won't be reimbursed by the orange president?

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trump? Reimburse?

Wait….. what?

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 19 points 1 month ago

Maybe the wrong word. I mean in the sense that Elon thought of getting something more out of his 45 mil a month to trump once the latter became again president.

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 1 points 1 month ago

The aid money for Ukraine. Or from selling government secrets.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Not Trump may lose. is going to lose.

This is going to be seen as the political equivalent of the 2017 patriots 28-3 come from behind win against the Falcons. Momentum has shifted, women now have an actual woman to vote for, and whoever the VP pick is, will seal the deal.

Border issue:

Republicans killed a bill that would have fixed it

Abortion and IVF:

Republicans are against both things which 80% of America are for.

Honest to goodness Nazi playbook in Project 2025:

Who the fuck would vote for that shit if the democrats actively show the public what's in it?

Old as dirt candidate:

That's the Orange Shit-Stain on the right.

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

I agree, but...

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

IVF lol.

was watching the news at the time and the Gaza war was on.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago

Sadly, the average American are pretty supportive of the IDF

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

damn, I am really not into that sport or anything, but that asswhippin that the falcons toted around after that was rough on anyone in the metro area.

[–] jrbaconcheese@yall.theatl.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As an Atlantan, ouch. Great analogy but ouch.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Sorry 'bout that, lol. I felt for you guys. As a Packer fan in the northeast, I was pulling for them.

NFC for life, son.

Except the Bears. They can fuck right off.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tesla profits are way down. He might simply be unable to afford it. Simplest explanations and all.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago

I don’t know if this is the actual reason, but it’s damn pleasant to think about.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Maybe the Tesla board finally explained to him that Trump voters don’t buy their products.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

There's no smidge of conscience, this is merely self preservation after he became aware that he was drawing too much attention to it.

[–] baru@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Uh and what has changed for the muskrat to suddenly grow a smidge of conscious?

It's best to really doubt what Musk says. Likely he's still giving money but using weasel words to pretend he's not because of the fallout.