politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I think it's great that there are several really great choices here - a stark contrast from the GOP cesspool and their pick of Just Dance Vance.
For me though, my pick is Mark Kelly. Who doesn't absolutely love and admire an astronaut? They have seen some crazy shit, and had to work their asses off to get where they're at. He obviously has way more accolades than just that, but I'm drawn to that one specifically.
That being said, that's just what's in my head, I don't know enough about all of them to really be an expert on each potential pick, and it sounds like each has some really great things to bring to the table.
Whatever choice is made, I doubt we will hear about Dems scrambling to replace them within a couple weeks because they previously called Kamala a deplorable human being or were rumored to fuck couches, lol.
Everybody likes Kelly it seems. The fact he was an astronaut is cool, but the issues are what matters to me honestly.
Kelly opposes Medicare for all. This is my deal-breaker unfortunately. Opposing Medicare for all is NOT centrist or moderate, it's right of center or a conservative standpoint. Again, my personal deal breaker.
Additionally, he opposes the green new deal, and supported expanding oil drilling.
If he ends up being the choice, I'll be dissapointed but still obviously vote.
Yep. He's bad on labor too. Walz and Beshear are much better on policy and are extremely likeable VP candidates.
Thank you for sharing that info!