this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2130 readers
99 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On stuff outside of lemmygrad, we are receiving a lot of hate, especially by those who just moved from Reddit. Guess they lost their hidden privilege at Reddit as their rhetoric used to be almost universal over there, while genzedong and our other subs get censored and banned. And now, on lemmy, their stuff isn’t universal, as we are more prevalent here. Seems like they really want that hidden privilege back

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

dear comrades living and dead, please help give me the self control not to try arguing with all the "Lemmy is anti human rights" takes polluting the fediverse rn 🙏

[–] ReformOrDDRevolution@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I deeply care about human rights

Must be one of the most nebulous and abstract things you can stand for. What rights? The right to die on the street? The right to monopoly?

[–] TheGreatSpoon@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

The right to be airstriked by NATO peacekeepers, duh

[–] SterlingVapor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The right to be forced to work to earn back the right to exist

[–] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That post on !196@lemmy.blahaj.zone got me fked up because one of the comments there was like “authoritarian communism” is an oxymoron actually 🤓 and another was like “Marxism is not materialism” and it had double digit upvotes.

Like jesus WHAT THE FUXK are you on about. Read Marx and Engels. Read Lenin.

It’s like arguing with toddlers.

[–] rngzz@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You lost them at asking them to read. They do not read.

[–] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This is false. They can definitely read... Twitter and reddit and anything else pumped out by the feds that comes in short quips with no real background information or data backing it up.

[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Read Marx and Engels. Read Lenin.

Marx is a tankie, Engels is a tankie, Lenin is a tankie.

Stalin dunks on these types in Anarchism or Socialism it’s funny af, some say Marxism bad bc it’s materialism, some say it’s bad because it’s not materialism, some say it’s bad because they don’t understand the what type of materialism it is, and don’t even get him started on what Nobati and Sh. G. thinks of Dialectics😪

[–] angrytoadnoises@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I wonder if it's struck them yet that, as their neoliberal platform fails, other platforms built on fundamentally better ideas and infrastructure are rising up. I wonder if this challenges their preconceived notions at all? Nah, it's just a bunch of tankies.

[–] PorkrollPosadist@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It is definitely inducing cognitive dissonance. The developers are simply are communists trying to collectivize social media, and that will live in their heads rent free as long as they stick around.

[–] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I saw someone comment, in an almost gleeful manner "I didn't even know of the word Tankie until today!" like a kid who just learned about the word "Fuck". 🙄

[–] AlbigensianGhoul@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just you wait until US newscorps start advocating to ban the entirety of lemmy and its source code from the USA.

[–] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If Imperial America suffers a crisis even severer than the one in the summer of 2020, that would become a serious possibility.

[–] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

obviously the Chinese are making us all think for ourselves and talk amongst ourselves.. there could be no other answer

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The really good news is that all the communities on lemmy.ml have been created long before radlibs showed up, and are administered by sane people.

[–] ReformOrDDRevolution@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lemmy.ml banned my account there lol. Why are they so concerned with a little bullying of liberals?

Lemmy is tone policed... apparently except when someone is calling us "red fash", that's not bannable.

[–] kristina@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

really makes you wonder about the proclivities of the devs tbh

[–] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You gotta get the normies on the network for the network effect to take off!

[–] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i hate to say it, but i don't want the network effect taking off. in fact, that's a sign it's time to leave. is it possible to ever just have a smallish community where real discussion and ideas can flourish without the rest of the US dragging everything down to the lowest common denominator?

[–] Zaratustash@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Isn't that what the entire federation point is? We can keep this community and keep it insular.

To expect that lemmy as a whole can remotely be the same as lemmygrad is delusional and indicative of being way too online. If anything having lemmy as a whole being more moderate and broader based is a propagandistic tool (not that it even matters that much, online is fake, join a party).

Gramscian hegemonic analysis with regards to the superstructural "war" is silly as fuck and a huge waste of time. We will never have hegemony offline or online under capitalism, the smart response is to adapt, propagate our ideas where it makes sense, and act strategically.

Honestly for me online is mostly a venting space, I see literally zero value over debating libs in that area. Pushing a counter narrative has some use yes, but even then that impact is minimal, and conclusive to at best the worst recruits you can possibly imagine.

edit: it's also a dogshit habit when it comes to mass work where you have to interact with countless ideologically backwards elements in the organized working class. You will never find purity. Going full guns blazing on libs is a time and place and contextual situation and you need to learn how to not flip the fuck out over backwards and even reactionary ideas in those settings, because doing that will lead you to never be able to stamp them out amongst the masses.

[–] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess you have to ask yourself, are we spreading ideas and looking to chip away at the predominant hegemony, or do we want to self isolate?

One of the nice things about lemmy.ml is that it starts from a far left perspective and as a result of reddits own unmaking, places normies in a position of no longer being the predominant opinion in the room.

This has two outcomes from what I can guess:

  1. Normies show up in droves, and their perspectives shift as a result of having to defend their point of view for once.
  2. Normies show up, but leave because they can't handle not being able to call forth the shibaliths they're so accustom to, and having their points of view challenged on equal grounds.
[–] Blursty@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or normies show up and take over?

[–] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You think they're going to take over lemmygrad, or hexbear? The thing about federation is that you can avoid the outcome you're talking about by only federating with communities that share our values.

[–] Blursty@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well they've taken over lemmy.ml?

[–] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Registration on Lemmy.ml is no longer open I think. Lemmy.world is leading the pack for active users (or close to it). Regardless, why would the admins of lemmygrad and hexbear not enforce their own rules on the normies?

[–] Blursty@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I just went over to lemmy.ml and got called a Putler penis fellator or some such teenage insult.

[–] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You're going to have to have thicker skin then that comrade.

[–] Big_Farto@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Idk man, I got a temporary ban for saying that ACAB means all cops and some dipshit told me to read Lenin's State and Revolution lmao. Seems to me like a lot of people on here are just having dick measuring contests about how far left they are.

liberals flooding OUR website and then saying to kick us out is hilarious to me

[–] Henkire@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait until the liberals find out that free and open source decentralized networks like Lemmy align with the general direction of communism.

( At least, I assume it does. I may be very wrong. In which case, I apologize. )

[–] MoreIronOre@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ah yes. The big communist governments are known for * checks notes * their staunch, unmoving ideals of free speech.

[–] misterslime12@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

You should talk to Edward Snowden and Julian Assange about free speech.

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

"free speech" without consequence from the state has never existed, and certainly not in capitalist states

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone click on the All button and start participating in federation.

Worst thing that can happen is the liberals complain.

But if you're going to be participating on lemmy.ml please don't make the admins' job harder, respect the instance rules. They're already working overtime to handle the influx of new users across the software.

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you're going to throw around "liberals" as some sort of derogatory "us vs them" term then you should probably think twice before clicking all.

There are two sides to any coin. Check yourself before you shit on other people, to make sure you're not just proving yourself to be at least as bad as them.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, thank you, I've been posting on lemmy.ml for 4 years now.

[–] HornyOnMain@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

liberals is a derogatory term lol

[–] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ParentiBot@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The quote

In the United States, for over a hundred years, the ruling interests tirelessly propagated anticommunism among the populace, until it became more like a religious orthodoxy than a political analysis. During the Cold War, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

-- Michael Parenti, Blackshirts And Reds

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the admins of this instance if you have any questions or concerns.

[–] PoY@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Man.. I haven't been on reddit in quite a while but I don't remember it being such a shitlibfest. It's really bad and it pretty well overran lemmy.ml immediately.

[–] CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Reddit tends to ban commies. It's like a mini red scare: with the left removed, the right thrives.

[–] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It puts me in an odd spot because I care amd believe in Lemmy as a project and I want it to grow, but on the other hand it was kinda nice to not be called a fascist... because im a communist... because that somehow makes me the antithesis of communism

[–] OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think there will be an adjustment period, where the Reddit habits will continue to be exhibited. Most redditors have been heavily propagandized for years. Those that stick around and don't end up in defederated instances will eventually grow more and more deprogrammed.

There's currently a big push on reddit to keep the protesting communities away from a lemmy migration (downvotes, censored comments, highly upvtoed suggestions towards irrelevant alternatives that are owned by corporations and not part of the Fediverse). I suspect that the massive Western psyops mechanism is afraid to lose one of their most effective echo-chambers.

The only concern I have is that lemmy.ml is already leaning towards tone policing, which makes it somewhat susceptible to be taken over by the shitlibs and fascists.

[–] nephs@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How are they leaning towards tone policing?

I think we need to some easier ground for people to land and figure out an alternative to propaganda exists. That's the role of main lemmy.ml, in my opinion, being a landing pad. I think it would be sensible to remind people that the place for talk between tankies is here, not there. And arguably, some general communities here should be more accessible to the "general" public than others.

People that give themselves the work to come check us out need to be happy to see sensible people, and sensible discussions, even though we know and are angry at seeing the same pattern and problem everywhere. There's a path, a funnel to understanding that. And everyone is in their own personal journey. Our role is to feed them and give them directions.

We didn't get here because someone though us. We got here because someone fed our curiosity. And there's different food for different stages of curiosity.

[–] OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lemmy.ml mods/admins tend to remove heated discussions. That by itself is not necessarily bad, but it has been taken advantage of by various alt-right characters who were seeking to troll or propagandize under the guise of "asking questions in a civil manner", then reported anyone who responded to them in an even slightly offensive manner. That will certainly be happening again with the massive migration from reddit.

As for the rest of it. I completely agree, and that was my original point: Be patient and engage the new arrivals. At the very least, it'll help them grow out of the behaviours reddit has taught them.

[–] GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

How are they leaning towards tone policing?

The rules lean towards "civility" over the actual content of what is said, which left it vulnerable to "just asking questions" types. It's being revised after a spat with a TERF who took advantage of those rules.