207
submitted 2 months ago by FenrirIII@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 81 points 2 months ago

Meanwhile, in Florida...

"Wanna see how many folks we can kill? Let's repeal requirements for employers to provide adequate cooling!"

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 42 points 2 months ago

What they did is so much worse than repealing something. They crafted a new law making it illegal for local city/county governments to enact their own protections for workers during extreme heat. They literally took away these people's agency to make decisions for themselves just to get some headlines before the election.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

The spirit that enabled slavery never died. Angry, hateful people gonna be angry, hateful people.

And angry peoe will vote for them.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 months ago

John Browns spirit is still marching as well. The problem is that those who march in contrast are cowards who hide behond legalism and state sponsored thugs. Used to be you could just kill them and their bitches, now thered be an investigation and thats assuming they dont catch ya thrpugh security cameras or some shit

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

How do you think John died?

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

He was hung by that bastard Lee, the failure of Brown was neither spirit or tactics it was method. He shouldve kept at bleeding the slavers and eventually he may have killed enough to succeed at starting a slave revolt. The problem is he jumped two steps ahead.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

He was hanged for committing crimes against the United States. He was one of the sparks of the war yes, but Grant would’ve executed him too.

Don’t forget that the heroes of the civil war immediately went west to commit a horrific genocide.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago

Don't forget about eliminating water breaks!

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 months ago
[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago

Eventually they will realize that a major city in the desert is a bad idea.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

There is a reason it is named Phoenix. That valley has been settled and abandoned several times throughout history.

The only reason it has survived this time is through the power of air conditioning.

[-] w2tpmf@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago

Horse shit.

It was never abandoned. The valley was steadily habitated for thousands of years by a number of tribes before American settlers forces the Yaqui from the land.

None of them had air conditioning, and they thrived until a foreign invader took their land by force.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago

They were also nomadic, and left when it got too dry/hot. Which goes to show they were a lot smarter than most people living there now.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I don't know the history here, but wouldn't a nomadic people that leave when the heat / drought gets bad, still count as "abandoning", in a sense? Or were they more or less a permanent settlement?

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

To me, "abandonment" means they have no plans to return. It sounds like what they did was more similar to what retirees do with winter homes in Florida/Arizona and summer homes in the midwest/northeast.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Sure, but the context was that one person asserted that Pheonix was a terrible place to place to have a permanent settlement because of heat and drought, and someone else refuted with an "Ackchyually" style response.

If the native people relocated regularly to avoid heat and drought, then that strengthens the first assertion that it's a bad place to support a permanent population.

But again, I don't know the actual habits of these specific natives. Maybe they weren't nomadic and found ways to survive where Pheonix now stands. I asked because I'm curious to the history.

[-] w2tpmf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

They survived by digging a canal system to bring water from rivers far away. Those same canals are what feeds Phoenix it's water a milenia later. We just added cement to them.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Huh. That's pretty awesome. I had no idea that there were native American tribes contructing long aqueducts.

https://www.arizonamuseumofnaturalhistory.org/plan-a-visit/mesa-grande/the-hohokam

Seems like archeologists think that they were most likely wiped out by a population boom followed by a bad drought, though. Still, I had no idea that level of agriculture existed at the time. Pretty interesting.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That level of agriculture is nothing compared to what civilizations like the Aztecs, who figured out how to grow crops in the middle of a lake, and the Inca, who figured out how to freeze-dry crops they grew on landscaped, terraced mountainsides.

The Maya were also really excellent at hydraulic engineering out of necessity because there were no lakes or rivers in much of their domain.

And then there's the plant we call corn or maize today. This is what it started as (teosinte) before people in Mexico started selectively breeding it over thousands of years:

People really need to understand that 'stone age' (or bronze age in the case of the Inca) does not actually mean they were unable to understand how to do really complicated things. People look at an expertly-knapped mesolithic hand axe and think they could do it themselves in 20 minutes with any rock they picked up.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I think they were talking about the Anasazi, but that was a different part of Arizona.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Nerfherders!!

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

Even if global warming wasnt a thing, just dont live in a fucking desert.

[-] aliceblossom@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This city is a monument to man's arrogance.

  • Peggy Hill
[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I would but I was born here and don't know of anywhere better that has legal weed and not a completely out of control cost of living.

[-] Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Give Michigan a chance! Sure winter sucks but it doesn't really kill like the heat, I think?

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago

It is no longer a signpost on the way to oblivion, but a neon billboard sitting in your living room

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I like to mention that even my Trump supporter coworker admits climate change is real. Can't deny it in our line of work.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Engineering, mostly government infrastructure.

Areas are flooding that are not supposed to be flooding, equipment is overheating that shouldn't. It's a big deal in this sector now especially because the dumb shit PEs don't want to account for it.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

If only there some way to keep it from getting so hot - oh, well.

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

While I’m all for helping avert the inevitable disaster from human caused climate change. Most of the parts of Arizona where it gets hot AF have always been deadly and like this. The difference for a long time was less concrete and asphalt, and less people. Honestly a lot of the areas around here in the Nevada/California/Arizona desert regions were nomadic areas with people coming to live here during more pleasant winter months. Living here in the summer is still a bad idea.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They water the air in Sedona. Let that sink in for a minute. They use machines to spray water into the air, and no, I’m not talking about a humidifier. Like over-the-door air conditioning units that just piss water all over the sidewalk, except it evaporates before it ever makes it to the concrete, just to keep people from passing out while walking to the corner store.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

That's not air conditioning, at all.

That's evaporative cooling, and it's been used for hundreds of years in cultures worldwide to help reduce heat. Adding humidity into dry air naturally reduces the heat index. It's not supposed to make it to the ground, the entire point is for it to evaporate and increase ambient humidity in the air.

It's extremely energy efficient, but is limited to very dry environments. Above about 30% ambient humidity it quickly stops being effective at cooling the air, and at around 60% ambient humidity it's just no longer noticeable. So for a desert area, it is an ideal, cheap and easy way to cool an area.

There are evaporative systems designed for homes and businesses that use the same principle. A box with an opening on one side for airflow, a large wet pad and a fan combined with ducting, will cool an entire home. It uses remarkably little water, and power only to run a simple pump to keep the pad wet and the fan spinning. It uses a fraction of the power and air conditioner uses and is a lot more effective when humidity is low.

For most of the summer an air conditioner isn't even needed to cool a home. Central ducting with an evaporative cooler will work for 90% of the summer. Only during the monsoons where the humidity is too high for it to be effective is an AC system really necessary.

Source: I live in AZ and my home has both an evaporative cooler and an air conditioner.

[-] w2tpmf@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Yup. Evaporative cooling was popular in AZ before electricity was available. In the late 1800s to early 1900s there were many homes and building with cooling towers on them. People would hang wet sheets across them and the cooling effect would create a current as it fell down the tower which would on turn create more draft across the cooling cloth.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

Do you have separate discrete units to pull that off? Or are they both tied into the same air circulation system?

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Discrete units but both attached to the same ductwork.

Since A/C needs to operate on a closed system there's a one-way damper just below the Evaporative cooler where it attached to the duct work. The evaporative cooler on the other hand works best in an open system, so you can direct airflow best by opening windows in rooms that need more cooling.

Two separate controls as well. The A/C is attached to a standard thermostat. The Evaporative cooler is simple by comparison, just a manual knob with Off, High Fan, Low Fan, High Cool, Low Cool, and Pump only. The last three run the pump to keep the pad wet.

At night, Low Fan might be all that's needed even in the summer, just moving air. The cooler moves A LOT more air around the house than the A/C does since it has a massive spinning drum fan and an open airflow system.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

That's a clever arrangement! Thanks for sharing. I'm in Colorado and we get dry enough that evaporative cooling is effective, but home came with AC, which means everything just gets dry and you static shock all your electronics to death as your power bill spins up to infinity. I never considered that one could have a dual system to switch between. What is your temperature differential with the evap operational? 20 degrees or so?

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah about 15-20 normally, but can get up around 30 around peak summer with zero humidity. Above about 100 outside though it just can't keep up and the AC is needed even with low humidity.

So basically above 100 and above about 40% or so humidity, the AC is needed, otherwise the evap cools better and is a lot cheaper to run.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I meant “like” as in similar to, not as a filler word. I know they’re not air conditioners. I was likening the design for descriptive purposes for people who live in less arid regions. It was especially surprising to see them aimed outdoors when I visited. When I asked a shop attendant about them, he said they were to keep tourists from passing out because they drink too much alcohol and not enough water. Haha

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

That's just evaporative cooling. People have been doing that for thousands of years. It's pretty damn effective at lowering the temperature a good amount in dry climates.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Totally. It’s very surprising for people who aren’t familiar with it to experience for the first time. Especially aimed outdoors.

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Live underground

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I hope these cooling stations are just something they are planning to buy and run, not something they are designing. Arizona has the second worst run infrastructure teams in North America in my experience dealing with them.

this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
207 points (99.5% liked)

News

21752 readers
3333 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS