this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
152 points (91.8% liked)

politics

18720 readers
3320 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Trump on Monday formally demanded the recusal of the federal judge overseeing his 2020 election subversion case in Washington, D.C.

Trump’s attorneys cited statements U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan made while sentencing two previous Jan. 6 defendants that appeared to reference Trump, arguing the comments create a perception that Chutkan prejudged Trump’s guilt before he was charged.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 75 points 11 months ago

Get fucked, Cheeto chimp!

Lock him up! Lock him up! Lock him up!

[–] bemenaker@lemmy.world 54 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I demand trump write a full page ad in the NYT apologizing to America and the world for being such a douchebag racist asshole, and fucking everything up. And then proceed to jail.

[–] FReddit@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He did that once before, when he demanded the death penalty for the Central Park Five, who were wrongfully convicted.

He is a racist piece of shit.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 49 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Judges that are going to recuse themselves do so before they take on the case. This is both a stalling tactic and a fundraising technique. He probably already has the fundraising emails ready to go decrying the rigged liberal judge that refuses to recuse.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yup. These meritless motions are done just to make news headlines. Habba, one of Trump's lawyers, was previously fined $1,000,000 for filing frivolous motions for the purpose of political grandstanding.

[–] VitoScaletta@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The very same.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I do have to say...I'm loving Lemmy just for the crowd. Normally on Reddit, I'd be sorting through a mass of racist shitheads defending their shithead leader for an article like this, but most people here are just having conversations, whether they agree with the position of the linked content or not.

It's nice.

[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Yeah on here you just have to avoid anything that says hexbear.

[–] Cjwii@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

Now you done it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Looks like so far, only 4 racist shitheads have found your comment. Only here, they’re too cowardly to refute your point.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are a few shitheads on lemmy.world.

Certain subreddits were alright.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

Mostly they are on other servers

[–] negativenull@lemm.ee 31 points 11 months ago
[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

So um...bets on how detailed she goes in her "fuck no" statement? Think it's going to be simple like a sentence or just a "no" or something extended?

[–] Alto@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No in whatever the shortest way to say no in legalese is

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Legalese needs more words, something like "motion denied" would work.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It would be nice if they could respond in giphys or video clips. I suggest something like this:

https://inv.tux.pizza/watch?v=S_TYom5_gDk

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The judge should say, "sure. As soon as Clarence Thomas starts recusing himself."

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 4 points 11 months ago

As fun as that would be, it would achieve nothing good.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Oh, gawd, I'd love to see that.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Somebody needs his diaper changed!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I imagine the ketchup cleaning crew has been stepped up a notch in the past year or so...

[–] OldFartPhil@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago

Trump demands a lot of things.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Lol Clarence Thomas first

[–] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Who the fuck is this orange shitstain to demand anything?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] morgan_423@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Chutkan: Recuse myself? No, I don't think I will, thank you.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

You have no power here! 😅

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He’s in no position do demand anything from anyone. He should be begging for mercy.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Oh course he is trying to make demands. Obviously it's damaging to his case so he wants the recusal.

[–] skabbywag02@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

".... cause when you're a star, they let you do it..."

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Former President Trump on Monday formally demanded the recusal of the federal judge overseeing his 2020 election subversion case in Washington, D.C.

“Although Judge Chutkan may genuinely intend to give President Trump a fair trial — and may believe that she can do so — her public statements unavoidably taint these proceedings, regardless of outcome.”

In October 2022, Chutkan chided Ohio Jan. 6 defendant Christine Priola during her sentencing that she and other rioters offered “blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day,” according to a hearing transcript.

Trump has publicly criticized Chutkan before, claiming she “obviously wants me behind bars,” and is “very biased and unfair.” He has also speculated that there is “no way” he will receive a fair trial under the federal judge and previewed he would file the recusal motion.

“Public statements of this sort create a perception of prejudgment incompatible with our justice system,” Trump’s attorneys wrote.

“In a case this widely watched, of such monumental significance, the public must have the utmost confidence that the Court will administer justice neutrally and dispassionately.


The original article contains 537 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When a judge tells you to go fuck yourself do you get lube or not?

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

He can demand anything he wants. He's owed nothing.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Awww, keep stomping those little feet of yours, little prezzy. Who's a wittle insurrectionist? Oh that's right, you are. You are!

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago
[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Someone give that baby a pacifier.

load more comments
view more: next ›