382
submitted 1 month ago by spirinolas@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 138 points 1 month ago

There, the tourists “violently intimidated one of activists, who is a racialized woman, calling her ‘fascist’, ‘monkey’, telling her to go back to Africa and even threatening to kill her.”

Sounds on par for ethnic supremacists.

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago

The "go to Africa" made me confused because all the people seemed to be white Portuguese. I saw nobody of African descent (and it still wouldn't be OK).

Maybe our nice tans were to offensive for those snow flakes.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Do Israelis not also have tans?

[-] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

The majority of Jews and Israeli people are of European Caucuses descent today. Very few are descendents of the Semites. Ironically, the majority of Palestinians are closer descendents of the Semites than the current global Jewish population... Hmm...

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I was thinking more I was thinking more of tans from sunlight. And guessing you get a decent amount of sun in Israel as you do in Portugal. It seems like the original comment was saying Israelis are more white than Portuguese. I was just wondering if that’s really true, or at least a common perception anyway.

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Not as sexy as ours, evidently.

[-] Pfeffy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Not the ones in power for the most part. An interesting historical fact is that Zionism didn't really take off in terms of Europeans headed to Palestine until a few years after sunscreen was invented.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

What does it mean to be racialized?

[-] Hamartia@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

To acquire one unpaired valence electron.

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago

Person of color, but only in a background where it has any significance. So a Chinese person is racialized in France, but not in China, and a German person is racialized in Japan, but not in Germany.

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

It's translated by Google from "racializado" I think. I think it's being singled out because of your race...or something...

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 79 points 1 month ago

Fortunately the bible only says to love your neighbour so you can really let loose when travelling.

[-] RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

the bible also contains accounts of god helping his people conquer land and uproot the residing population from it. I wouldn't use it as a moral reference.

In fact, let's be honest: there is no point in quoting any religious text, regardless of religion, when discussing morality. These texts are horribly dated and should be considered as historically interesting, but nothing more.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Hey I'm with you, my comment was supposed to highlight as much. Helping people conquer land is even one of the more palatable examples you can choose from when it comes to morally abhorrent things in the bible.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I mean, when there's no commandment against rape and the one for murder doesn't count when their god says it's totes ok bro, take their land and dash their babies against the rocks, they have no moral ground to stand on.

Religion is the language of the oppressors couched in fantasy to make you do their dirty work in the here and now for a payoff that certainly doesn't exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago

The audacity of entering someone's country, trying to control what they do and say and then tell them to go somewhere else "where they came from". Who would've expected an Israeli of being capable of such a thing.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Sounds like Elon Musk and Rupert Murdoch

[-] boyi@lemmy.sdf.org 62 points 1 month ago
[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago

israeli tourists should be banned from entering the EU, same as russian tourists. People from these two fucking countries should not be allowed in.

load more comments (39 replies)
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 56 points 1 month ago

Isn't there a word for when people go to a foreign country and attack the locals? Feels like it's right on the tip of my tongue...

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago
[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Why are these Nazis even allowed in?

[-] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

because they disguise themselves as Jews

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 month ago

Careful, they might try to steal your home while they're there.

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Coimbra is traditionally an academic city. The demonstrators were very peaceful. Had they done this in Porto, for example, it could've earn them a beating.

Portuguese peope are very good hosts, but you don't enter someone's "home" and tell them what to do. It's one of the most insulting things you can do as a visitor. And you don't tell us to "go to Africa". Honestly I'm surprised some old lady didn't came with a broom and sweep their asses into next week.

"They're not sending their best"

[-] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 month ago

I’m just waiting for the follow up of this headline now. “Israeli tourists attacking pro-Palestine supporters killed in attack, told to go home”.

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"This is my place, my place"

"Your place is is Africa! In Africa! Not here"

Shouts the Russian Israeli in a Portuguese square to the Portuguese demonstrating there against the actions of the nation he chose to live in.

Wow, just wow.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CritFail@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The two question zionists need to be explicitly asked are:

  1. Hypothetically, do they even believe it would ever be possible for Israel to commit genocide?
  2. If so, what characteristics would it need to have in order to qualify as genocide?

If they answer no to the first one, they expose their complete bias and therefore unable to even argue their position effectively.

If they answer yes, then they have to explain why the genocidal traits of what Israel are doing are not genocide, which might hopefully make them more introspective.

[-] febra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Send them home!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
382 points (96.1% liked)

World News

37368 readers
1652 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS