this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
90 points (88.8% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2375 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON, May 18 (Reuters) - Several top White House aides say they are confident protests across U.S. college campuses against Israel's offensive in Gaza will not translate into significantly fewer votes for Joe Biden in November's election, despite polls showing many Democrats are deeply unhappy about the president's policy on the war.

The White House optimism on the issue, which is shared by many in the Biden campaign, runs contrary to dire warnings from some Democratic strategists and youth organizers who warn misjudging the situation could cost Biden votes in a tight race with Republican rival Donald Trump.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 46 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Jesus tapdancing christ his advisors are so high on their own farts if they really believe that.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

College kids have crappy turnout. This is very well documented.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The U.S. Census Bureau estimated 54.1% of 18- to 29-year-olds voted in 2020, which had the highest youth turnout overall of any election in the 21st century.

Average across all ages is 60%

(Credit to @jordanlund@lemmy.world)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (33 children)

So you won't be blaming them if Trump wins? If they're insignificant enough to ignore, they're too insignificant to blame.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

Don't shoot the messenger.

load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My favorite is when counter protesters begin chanting "Fuck Joe Biden" and the pro-Palestine protestors join in

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The fuck are Repubs mad at him about? Is the genocide not happening fast enough?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

He's doing what they want while not being Trump.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

biden election people should be sending their people to these protests, imo

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They already have counter protesters.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Honestly idk what sounds crazier to me, that the counter protesters are democrats disguised as trump people because they have the most to gain from the protests being silenced, or that the counter protesters are actually right wing nazis in support of...ending the protests in order to benefit Joe Biden and literal Zionists because "libs bad."

I just think it's funny that really with the state of the world neither would come as a surprise, honestly.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

They think so huh? I mean if Biden wanted to vote for trump he should just say so!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (5 children)

This is what "blue no matter who" gets us.

Politicians who don't care what we want because they're entitled to our votes as long as they're not as bad as Republicans.

Right now Schumer and Biden are trying to pass a "border bill" that would make some of the things we gave Trump shit for legal. Like, Biden really wanted to codify that any sitting president can "shit down the border" and prevent any asylum seekers from entering.

A child could see that if that passes, republicans will always say it needs done in office. Millions of people will be hurt by it, but it gives moderate Dems another knife to Dem voters throats:

Vote for me, or republicans will do that thing I just passed a law to let them do!

And there's no guarantee the Dem won't do it anyways.

It's really like watching a real life Brewster's millions, Biden keeps doing shit that's going to cost him the election, but apparently even listening to someone 40 years younger or even slightly to the left isn't something Biden can handle.

He only compromised with Republicans, and then gives them everything they want.

If protests don't work to change Biden's mind, what will?

What other options do voters have?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

No… this is what a rigged primary system gets us.

Voting for Republicans at this point - or voting third party - is voting for fascism. There is precisely zero chance that Trump will handle the Gaza Genocide better than Biden will. If Trump wins, I would expect him to order a few B-52 squadrons to carpet bomb Gaza “to help Israel”, and then he’d also probably do the same to the West Bank just because he thinks it’d make him look like a big boy.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Not voting at all is the real worry. It takes effort to vote. And when you can’t even rally your base against trump then you ducked up bad. He literally saying that he does not have to appeal to his base because he has them with the threat of trump. Fine then they just don’t give a fuck any more. Disengagement is the name of the game and we all lose

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 months ago

Yeah, this.

The back half of "Blue no matter who" was supposed to be primarying out regressive Democrats. Much like Labour in the UK, the party is doing its best to disenfranchise and disengage with actual progressives, so this is slow going.

It's not impossible, though: Republicans, to their current horror, let the inmates run the asylum and it shifted their political alignment from "capitalist" to "fascist".

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think the #1 problem is defining "youth voter" as 18-29.

College age is 18-24, but I don't see anything looking specifically at that demographic.

For 18-29:

https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/state-state-youth-voter-turnout-data-and-impact-election-laws-2022

"Nationally, CIRCLE estimates that 23% of eligible young Americans cast a ballot in the 2022 midterm elections."

Now, problem #1, that's a mid-term election which always draws lower voter participation.

2nd is looking at 18-29 instead of 18-24.

https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2023/12/05/young-americans-harvard-poll-trump-biden

"The U.S. Census Bureau estimated 54.1% of 18- to 29-year-olds voted in 2020, which had the highest youth turnout overall of any election in the 21st century."

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There is a huge difference between 18 and and 29, so it is odd that they lump all of them together.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

As a "youth vote". My 28 year old kid and his 29 year old wife haven't been in school in years now.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I was a libertarian in college. So yeah, college students don't have enough awareness to realize that another Trump presidency could mean the end of America (if SCOTUS doesn't beat him to it).

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 4 points 6 months ago

Some do. As a Freshman in college I was an idiot because I was raised on years of conservative talk radio every day to and from school. Took a bit less than a year to realize all that shit was made up and get deprogrammed. Then it's been a leftward trend ever since.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sounds about white. Jk, kinda

I was pretty far left by the end of high school. I only just missed voting for Obama and was all about that change! That was when I learned about things like our high income inequality, low social mobility, and rampant corporate profits

On a related note, I was super caught off guard by all the "libertarians" that hopped on that grifter, Ron Paul's, train. Man what a time. So many heated discussions. Good times

Did you support Paul(s)? Any regerts?

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I did support Ron back in the day. I still mostly respect the guy though. If he is another right wing grifter he's got his mask on 24/7. I don't think I've ever heard anything contradictory from him. However, like most "libertarians" he completely ignores that corporations exist or he thinks they'll magically self-regulate.

Rand went zero to fascist in no time so I was never really a supporter.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, grifter maybe isn't the best word to use. I just meant in the sense that libertarians seem to support policies that help themselves, even/especially if it's at the expense of others.

That's really good you were able to see the policies Rand supported were even worse

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It reminds me of the Star Trek TOS episode "City On The Edge of Forever."

When McCoy goes back in time to the 1930s he changes the future and ends the Federation. When Kirk and Spock go back they discover that a rising anti-war sentiment would lead to America staying out of WW2, allowing the Nazis to take control of the world.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I had to look up the date of TOS it aired 1966–1969 during the Vietnam war.

The lesson to be learnt here is that stopping the Vietnam war meant the Nazis would take over the world.

The anti-war sentiment won in 1973. That is year the Nazis and communists took over America and the whole world.

And that's all the fault of college kids protesting against the Vietnam war.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So, you don't know the difference between "1930" and "1970."

You don't know who was fighting in the Vietnam War.

Maybe, just maybe, instead of looking up the dates of old TV shows, you should read some actual history and basic math books?

https://bookshop.org/p/books/a-young-people-s-history-of-the-united-states-revised-and-updated-howard-zinn/18074845?ean=9781644212516

https://bookshop.org/p/books/math-made-easy-brain-based-learning-elementary-and-middle-school-math-james-paicopolos/15984839?ean=9798585055546

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I am substituting the Nazis for the Soviets as an example.

In 1970 the argument was that if America pulled out of Vietnam the commies would take over the world.

For every time 1930 is used as an excuse to promote war, a lot of pointless wars have been lost without dr. Evil taking over the world.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›