this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
205 points (97.2% liked)

politics

25238 readers
3429 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 144 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The chonky fascist was whining about being silenced and then decides not to take the stand.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 8 points 1 year ago

Now he can pretend he got silenced as the reason why he didn't take the stand.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Boooo. I’d love to see a few perjury charges tacked on.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] darkmarx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And this is likely exactly why they didn’t call him to the stand. They knew he’d immediately perjure himself, because he’s a compulsive liar. No amount of coaching or “just keep your answers short and only answer exactly what was asked” will keep Trump from lying on the stand.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You honestly think Trump would face perjury charges?

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just more examples of his dingleberries not having to follow the same rules as everyone else.

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Intimidation. Plain and simple.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Did they defense even defend him?

Edit: corrected spelling because someone thinks they are a smart ass.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lewdian69@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do we really have to wait a whole week for closing arguments? Just get the hung jury announcement out of the way and let in him off Scot-free, yet again. Can he just have a heart attack already? Sick of this

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

No, no. I want him to be in prison. Or at least haunted by endless trials until he dies of natural causes, all bitter and angry.

[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I have no hope of him ever facing consequences like the rest of us would.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

I feel stupid for reading any of these articles or commenting on them. We all know this movie ends with him getting away with it, but it's still compelling compelling for some stupid reason.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

All I'm seeing is that the guy on the right dropped a really nasty one and the guy on the left is mad because he didn't get a heads-up.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So a guy that claims to have been working as Cohens lawyer took the stand. If he was Cohens lawyer though, wouldn't attorney client privilege have prevented him from testifying about anything?

So the mere fact of his presence proves him to be a liar, right? What am I missing?

[–] dharwin@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

bwaaaaak, bwak bwak bwak bwak bwak bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaak

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Has anyone in this family even seen a chicken?

A scene from Arrested Development with multiple characters doing horribly inaccurate chicken impressions

[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Chaw! Chee-chaw! Chee-chaw!

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If it weren't for that damn gag order Dear Leader would have testified

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago
[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Guilty people usually don't.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

A whole week before closing arguments, yeesh.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

As usual, a coward.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe they bought one of the jurors?