170
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Blaze@reddthat.com to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 85 points 1 month ago

Remember, just because the money is spent, it doesn't mean it is spent well. I'm sure a lot of the US dollars are fed into sports programs and other spending, and not directly towards efforts that would benefit the most students or workers.

[-] Poiar@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

Yeah, also salaries are wildly different between these countries. This is a really not apples to apples

[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 23 points 1 month ago

This is PPP (purchasing power parity), so that gap should be corrected at least partially

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

Nah, that spins average income. US teachers are paid so low it's like victimization.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 weeks ago

You're right, teacher salaries are lower in the US than many of these countries.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

Montana starting teacher salaries are on par almost with Luxembourg teens working the first day of their first job. One of these needs a 4yr degree and the trust to work with developing minds; can you spot which one?

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 6 points 4 weeks ago

I'd wager that most school districts in the US have significantly more money spent on transportation than in other countries as well

[-] Microw@lemm.ee 6 points 4 weeks ago

For example, Austria is notorious for producing desastrous results in any metric (standardized tests, teen Analphabeten...) in relation to its spending on education.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The Hungarian numbers are inflated by religious schools, secular schools only would be in the very end, also we're forcing very old and inefficient teaching methods on our teachers, so old people can jizz their pants seeing kids not having free time to play outside (which they also complain about of course), and we also have a massive corruption problem (renovations, etc., cost way more they should because we need to make the prime minister's childhood friends billionaires).

[-] takeheart@lemmy.world 40 points 4 weeks ago

I'd much rather look a simple sorted table or a bar chart.

For me the country outlines don't add anything of value and they aren't too scale either with arbitrary rotations mixed in. Spending is on a strictly one dimensional scale yet the graphic implies some concentric (2-dimensional) pattern.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago

I agree. Standard bars are boring, and it's not bad to liven them up, but there are a lot of different ideas layered one over another with a little connection to data representation or increasing readability (also heatmaps with strict color gradations, false grouping, distance from center breaks at the bottom level mixing different colors). But nailing visuals without trying things out is impossible. OP got feedback they can put to use in the future.

Critically checking the graph after each step could've make it easier even for them. Had it become better in some way with X? If no, let's scrap it and try something different.

[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 4 points 4 weeks ago

Just to make things clear, this post is not OC, I did not create the infographic

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

aren't too scale

They're very scale, but not too scale. Good point.

[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

But it sorta looks like a human brain if you squint.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 31 points 4 weeks ago

Gotta give it up for the UK and US proving how institutionally corrupt their public services are!

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

I think with the US, it comes down to that number being an average and how big the spread is between states. North East and West Pacific states spend WAY more than South Eastern, but it averages out to something seemingly reasonable.

[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 16 points 4 weeks ago

Oh good, another thing Americans spend more than almost anyone else on and get worse results.

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 4 points 4 weeks ago

USA is huge and education is largely decentralized. Results are ALL over the place.

[-] tea 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

USA would probably be better if it were like 4-10 different countries....well, some of it at least.

New England Cascadia California Breadbasket States of America Gilead

[-] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

I'd like to see the America stat divided up further to represent red vs blue states educational spending.

[-] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

The US spends more on public education than multiple states where it's basically free for everyone. Now take a moment and appreciate how badly you are ripped off.

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

Just like healthcare...there are very few cases where replacing a societal motivation with a profit motivation results in better service or lower costs.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 weeks ago

very few

Well, okay. Zero is very few.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

Most private education in the US is nonprofit. The for profit institutions are generally not well thought of.

[-] Geobloke@lemm.ee 4 points 4 weeks ago

Finland is way lower than I expected and they apparently have the best primary and secondary education systems outside of the East Asian countries

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 weeks ago

Part of that is because private education there is not a thing. So some of the funds that would go to for-profit education at the expense of public schools instead goes into taxes to more efficiently fund education.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

As it should be. More accessible, cheaper through consolidation, people make more and pay more taxes, and repeat.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 weeks ago

It also prevents use of education to enforce class divisions.

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Primary to tertiary? Does that mean it includes what college students through grad school spend themselves? Because that would shift perception of this a lot.

Edit: The original data does include public funding and private funding:

Every year, governments, private companies, students and their families make decisions about the financial resources invested in education.

They do break it out, but I can't tell if the graphic is using the total or just the public funding.

So this graphic might just be: Americans spend a stupid amount on college.

[-] jwt@programming.dev 3 points 4 weeks ago

Israel's outline is sketchy to say the least...

[-] aggelalex@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

LMAO Greece isn't even there

[-] Sims@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, data can be beautiful - but is ugly if presented misleadingly. Only very little can be concluded from this 'graph' (without sources btw), but it is presented as if the inner west are the great core of enlightenment, spiraling out to the 'dumber' nations. The level of knowledge excellence is obviously related to the amount of dollu spent - which is nonsense. My equally valid opinion is that Western liberal/Capitalist education is exceedingly inefficient, and only optimized for wage-slavery. Notice how all the super 'edumecated' citizens from the west have been so easily propagandized to think that Russia is the bad guy. ..China is the bad guy ..socialism is bad ..communism evil ..Capitalism GREAT! We are the best!! ..and so on and so on with similar infantile propaganda from the Capitalist elite. The average intellects in these 'educated' western nations is Embarrassing, and misinformation from constant propaganda doesn't help much i'm afraid..

[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 6 points 4 weeks ago

without sources btw

The source is the OECD report, mentioned in the article linked in the body of the post: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2023_e13bef63-en;jsessionid=Nwj9hwVlYhHg_5CpjLm00wyws3HlwUqKzRpJLk2T.ip-10-240-5-115

In this article, we’re going to delve into some of the data from the OECD’s report.

[-] halvar@lemm.ee 2 points 4 weeks ago

I'm from Hungary, can comfirm, ~~it's shit here~~ it could be better.

[-] sqgl@beehaw.org 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Am surprised to see Australia rates highly. 40% of students don't know it takes about a year for Earth to orbit the Sun.

I would guess that half the population doesn't understand compound interest.

I would also guess only 5% could describe the scientific method, 1% could describe the use of normal distributions.

I would guess that 20% of locally born Australians would not know how to use punctuation or grammar for clear expression.

Is this a worldwide trend? The rise of flerfers suggests it is.

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

I guess when you consider that citizens of rich capitalist countries have to throw away so much of their income in commodified and privatised education, I guess that it is possible that countries like amerikkka can spend near the top.

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Canadian average is about 1 or 2 thousand less than that from the last info I could find a few weeks ago

[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

Was that info also with purchase power parity? Might explain the difference

[-] workerONE@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Why is it in thousands of $? Should be measured in % of GDP

[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

The % of GDP is available in the link in the post body

this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
170 points (92.1% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

5773 readers
13 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS