355
submitted 9 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The White House reiterated on Friday that President Biden would not pardon his son Hunter Biden if he is convicted of a crime.

When asked if Biden would commute his son’s sentence if convicted on gun charges, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said no. This marks the first definitive answer the administration has given since Hunter Biden was formally charged on Thursday, though a similar message was first floated in July.

“I’ve answered this question before,” Jean-Pierre said, referencing the July briefing. “It was asked of me not too long ago, a couple of weeks ago, and I was very clear, and I said no.”

Hunter Biden was indicted on three felony gun charges, alleging that the younger Biden illegally purchased a gun while on drugs. The charges could carry a 10 year sentence if convicted.

His attorney has denied the charges, and said their constitutionality is “very much in doubt”

“It is a unique and unjustified charge. Hunter owned an unloaded gun for 11 days,” attorney Abbe Lowell said Thursday. “There has never been a charge like this that has been brought in the United States.”

The president’s son is also under investigation by a federal special counsel for alleged tax misconduct and by a Republican House investigation into prior business deals.

Special Counsel David Weiss stated in court filings that he intends to finalize charges related to the tax misconduct by the end of the month.

Republicans allege that Biden used his position to garner lucrative deals for his son. Members of the House GOP have used the claims to push for an impeachment inquiry against the president.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OctopusKurwa@lemm.ee 150 points 9 months ago

Meanwhile Trump sold people like Lil Wayne pardons for 2 million quid a pop and sprung Roger Stone and Paul Manafort.

[-] biker_bard@lemmy.world 84 points 9 months ago

Doesn’t matter because they’re not playing by the same rules. Things like ethics are NOT relevant to the right. They only care about perceived wins. We are quickly approaching the point where ALL things will be on the table.

[-] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Just curious because my imagination can't reach that far - but aside from outright civil war (because they've explicitly voiced support for it), what other things can happen that are "unprecedented" when we've already had plenty of instances of domestic terrorism and a literal coup attemp where the mob wanted to lynch the sitting VP

[-] crypticthree@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

There is very much a precedent for civil war

[-] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago

Right? The precedent has been set, the president can use the pardon power for favors or profit or whatever. Biden should just call it a witch hunt, pardon Hunter, and everyone will forget in 2 weeks.

[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago

That's the kind of thing you only get to do when you sell your soul to the devil.

If you're the soul having variety of politician then that option simply isn't available to you.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 8 points 9 months ago

Problem is that it still damages the institutions and weakens the rule of law and democracy. The right always has an advantage because they want to destroy democracy while playing politics, whereas the center and left need to also protect democracy on top of playing politics.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Too many people, even on the left, don't understand this point. The Democrats have to fight bad faith actors while not stooping the their shitty level.

So every time I hear lefties screaming why isn't Joe doing more, it's because he has to play by the rules and not act like lunatic Trump.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

And Rod Blagojevich who tried to use his power as Governor of the state of Illinois to literally sell a senate seat to the highest bidder. He was convicted and sent to prison....and Trump pardoned him.

[-] hudson@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago

2 million quid a pop

Thanks for the mental image of Trump forcing Lil Wayne to pay in British Pounds rather than USD in some sort of sadistic mind-game.

[-] PupBiru@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

i believe the current policy is to force people to pay in rubles

[-] loobkoob@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

Two million rubles? Let me check down the back of the sofa

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

And Flynn, who is an unindicted co-conspirator I’m Georgia now, for things he did since he was pardoned.

[-] rastilin@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Revoke their pardons then. It's only fair.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 82 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why would he? It’s fucking crazy how the GOP has so normalized corruption that this is something to be asked of a president.

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

Because it's a bullshit charge to begin with. He should just pardon everyone with a conviction for that.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

I'm going to keep asking this question and you should too: why is the NRA being so silent?

[-] Bread_And_Buried@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 9 months ago

The NRA, and Republicans supported gun control targeted at armed people of color, so this really shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.

Gun control in California comes from Republicans being afraid of the Black Panthers, and Ronald Reagan is actually the one that banned open carrying in the state. Now Republicans blame liberals for the strict gun laws in California, because the brains of Republicans have been eaten by amoeba.

[-] charles@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Obviously because they agree that the federal government should be taking guns and locking up anyone who uses any drug. /s

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

Wrong political party

Rules for thee, not for mee

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

I'll ask that of 2a rights groups that actually do stuff, but the NRA has existed solely to fill Wayne LaPierre's pockets for a long time, they don't actually do shit.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Because the NRA isn't about gun rights.

[-] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

The GOP is what occurs when a sewer full of used condoms reach critical mass.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

This explains why they’re anti-abortion. They want to live…

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"If Joe pardons Hunter, then he's a terrible father for not teaching his son to take responsibility for his actions. And if Joe doesn't pardon Hunter, then he's a terrible father for not showing his son unconditional love and understanding."

Coming soon from Fox or NYT near you.....

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Oh, I heard pretty much the same thing on on local radio. I think they all get the same newsletter that tells them what their talking points should be.

[-] saruwatarikooji@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

You're not far off... Basically any news outlets with any ties to murdoch get a script for what they have to say.

There was a YouTube video not long back that pulled clips from a bunch of local news stations and showed how they were all saying the exact same thing almost verbatim... It started cutting between them in succession and the report was still coherent.

[-] Zerophnx@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

I mean, obviously he'll just pardon himself!

He's running for president, and that's why we keep hearing about him, right?

[-] seathru@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago

Hunter Biden was indicted on three felony gun charges, alleging that the younger Biden illegally purchased a gun while on drugs.

Do Republicans really want to open the Pandora's box of combing through firearms sales? Surely that leopard wouldn't turn on them.

Hunter owned an unloaded gun for 11 days

That kind of sounds like a straw purchase, and is something with a legal precedent. Why wouldn't they go for that?

[-] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

That kind of sounds like a straw purchase, and is something with a legal precedent. Why wouldn’t they go for that?

He only owned it for 11 days because his wife threw it in the garbage.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

That does not sound like the right way to get rid of a gun.

[-] seathru@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

Ahh, the old "My wife threw it in the trash". Second only to "I lost it in a boating accident".

I jest. Thanks for answering, I didn't know that part.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago

Hey president, so are you going to do something corrupt?

No? Really? Why the fuck not?

America is silly place...

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 9 months ago

Hol' up, this is bullshit. Even if you think there're other reasons to go after him (heard some noise about business dealings overseas, don't know what that's about), this is clearly bullshit. First of all, those republicans, like me, are supposed to support gun ownership, and imo that should include nonviolent felons. In fact, a court case recently ruled drug users can possess firearms, so I'm interested to see how that plays out.

Get good republicans, gun ownership is not a crime, nor are bump stocks, FRTs, DIAS, etc.

[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 11 points 9 months ago

If he did the crime, he should do the time. See how fucking simple that is, you republican monkeyspanks?

[-] blazera@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

Awesome, so republicans are on board with more gun regulation right?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
355 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18073 readers
4353 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS