40
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Skipper1402@lemmygrad.ml to c/palestine@lemmygrad.ml
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml 41 points 1 month ago

Hamas supports it, so do I.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 1 month ago

This is the correct answer. It doesn't matter what we think of a deal, it matters what the Palestinian people and their organs of resistance think of it. We should trust them to know if a deal like this is strategically useful to them at this stage in their struggle.

[-] RedColossus@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 month ago

This. Hamas knows, better than many armchair “experts” online that the goal is not for Israelis to find humanity (impossible) but to be so frightened that they’d rather flee Israel to the US, Europe, Argentina, Australia, etc. Half the nation has a second foreign passport, after the Al-Aqsa Flood, a significant number of Israelis citizens boarded on planes, buses and boats going anywhere for a short holiday. Fear of Hamas from the South and a significantly stronger Hezbollah from the north might, for once, cause a reverse settlement process.

You have to understand that for a number of decades the IDF has successfully portrayed itself as an unstoppable juggernaut, and therefore many “dual nationality” Jewish people are only there because they have been convinced it’s safe.

[-] caveman@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have read that in other to get Israeli citizenship you have to cancel any previous citizenships. Source: https://www.gov.il/en/service/request_for_citizenship_of_a_person_who_holds_pemanent_residency

Israel might play this even harder and say say remainder of people (50% as you say) also should loose it in order to stay in Israel.

[-] RedColossus@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 month ago

In theory, but Israel doesn’t decide even if they “canceled” the other citizenships, only the other country decides that.

[-] caveman@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Actually I once applied for a citizenship in another country. what the Country can do is to ask you to request your original country to delete your citizenship.

And many countries will accept it

[-] PanArab@lemmygrad.ml 29 points 1 month ago

No wonder Israel rejected it. The Gaza Strip being reconstructed is not Israel's goal. In fact no goal for Israel is achieved here. Not destroying the resistance, not expelling the Palestinians, not colonizing the Gaza Strip, nothing. Israel won't be held accountable for its crimes as usual, but the Palestinians made several gains since Al-Aqsa Flood.

I can't speak for the Palestinian resistance, they know best, but this proposal looks like a win for the resistance.

[-] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 29 points 1 month ago

I feel like most of this "plan" is just a return to status quo. The deal says nothing about acknowledging and educating Israeli's about the horrors of the Nakba and Zionism, or about apologizing for it's crimes and genocide, or about recognizing Palestinian statehood, just about Israel still having the region in a chokehold.

[-] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

Yup, just brings to mind the section in Martin Luther King's Letter From a Birmingham Jail about white moderates preferring order to justice

I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season."

[-] sinovictorchan@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The European immigrants in North America also continued to elect disciple of Anti-Chirst and censor the widespread leak of Holocaust in Indian Residential fake school death camps even as they criticize the Nazi German for subjugation of Europeans to their own savage policy and the Soviet for unproven Holodomor.

[-] caveman@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago

I don't think it's durable. As long as people kicked out from their properties since 1948 cannot return and Israel keels stealing more and more land there will be no peace.

[-] xkyfal18@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 month ago

not since 1948, since much, much earlier. Even before Palestine was under British rule.

[-] caveman@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

To be honest, even though I want Palestinians to her their stolen property back, due to the robbers (Israel) military might they will never get pre 1948 back.

They would be very lucky if they got pre 1967 borders. I read that Hamas and PA agreed on that.

Better ask Palestinians on social network with what they would agree

[-] xkyfal18@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 month ago

They will. The Zionist project is inherent unsustainable. However, I agree that for now it’s unrealistic not to settle for pre-1967 borders (decolonisation of Gaza and West Bank)

[-] caveman@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I read the book "The Jewish Paradox" from Nahum Goldman, the First president of the World Zionist Congress and also president of the World Jewish Congress.

He was one of the leaders who accepted the UN partition plan. He says that Israelis at the time wanted to kill him, because Israelis wanted all the land for them, no compromise.

But other leaders were convinced that they would never get a better offer, and also that having a State was a good platform to later take all of the land to them, for with a State you have some minimal stability and you can get an army and all other infra structure that they didn't have before.

If the Palestinians also took this into consideration they could, I guess, be far better now.

I recommend you to read this book because:

  1. Goldman is against the culture created by Ben Gurion of being enemies of Arabs, so he shows many of Israelis misdoings, and also because

  2. you can see some of the strategies they used to create their country.

The same strategy could be useful for Palestinians.

[-] xkyfal18@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Goldman was the most dovish member of the Zionist movement, directly responsible for the idea of a partition plan during meetings in Paris in 1946 program, as opposed to the Biltmore conference, in which scum like Ben-Gurion exalted the idea of taking over all of Palestine. He was the one who pleaded with the British authorities to accept his plan before they transferred the matter to the UN in mid-late 1947.

for with a State you have some minimal stability and you can get an army and all other infra structure that they didn’t have before.

Even before the existence of Israel, there was already effectively an embryonic state, called the Jewish agency, with Ben-Gurion serving both as Minister of Defense and Prime Minister. Its military was called the Hagana, which oversaw many ethnic cleansing operations and countless surveillance and reconnaissance operations, known as the “village files”. Their main money source was the JNF (Jewish monetary fund), which they used to buy plots of land from absentee landlords and to fund their campaigns.

If the Palestinians also took this into consideration they could, I guess, be far better now.

Pretty sure that with everything I’ve said before, it disproves this claim. They would NOT be better off and had every right to criticise and denounce a plan that came straight out of the zionists. They had been building settlements and kicking out the native population as early as the mid 1910s, when Palestine was still under Ottoman rule. They also tried to accept Britain's system of “parity” with the settlers (that in practice favoured the latter), only for the latter to reject it and pave way to the 1929 (and in a way 1936) riots.

Lastly I highly doubt a Palestinian state could ever exist properly alongside the Zionist entity, as the latter's existence is predicated on genocide, violence and ethnic cleansing, but I can see where you’re coming from. Hamas supports a 2 state solution (probably as a temporary goal), so that gives me enough of a reason to support it too.

I might check out your book and I also recommend Ilan Pappe's “the ethnic cleansing of Palestine”. Genuinely amazing

[-] caveman@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I have read a little about the Baltimore conference

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biltmore_Conference

Weird how since 100+ years some Jews talk about the area as if it was desertic and no human being was there.

Do they think the people Living there before are cockroaches or sand?

That's enraging

Maybe they have this tradition since milleniaz because in the Torah they just said "God gave them the land". Maybe their ethnic cleansing attitude is with them since thousands of years, no matter who is there.

What a racist inheritance!

[-] caveman@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I was really going to ask you for a book indication. Nice that you did it on the end.

If I could I would follow you, but Lemmy doesn't has this option :(

[-] caveman@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

This documentary is really good:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bwy-Rf15UIs

1948: Creation & Catastrophe (Full documentary)**

[-] TankieReplyBot@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[-] supersolid_snake@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Can't trust them. Like at all. Ask the Native Americans.

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

Palestine

824 readers
17 users here now

A community for everything related to Palestine and the occupation currently underway by the occupying force known as Israel.

Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism. Existence is resistance for Palestinians.

Please refer to Israel as Occupied Palestine, or occupied territories. The IDF is a fascist and ethnonationalist occupying force. Israelis are settlers. We understand however that the imperial narrative (which tries to legitimise Israel) is internalised in the imperial core and slip-ups are naturally expected.

We always take the sides of Palestine and Palestinians and are unapologetic about it. Israel is an occupying power whose "defence force"'s (note the contradiction) sole purpose for existing is to push Palestinians out so they can resettle their rightful land. If you have anything positive to say about Israel we do not care.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS