this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
258 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
3634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another reason to never listen to anything recommended by spotify

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (4 children)

deeply deeply twisted company

they think of music simply as 'content'. cynical, disgusting.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago

Yeah it’s unfair.

The music industry is famous for being run on love and passion, and not advertising manufactured hits.

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Uh, music is content. Some music has more heart than others, but I wouldn't say that Target is disgusting because they sell cheap prints and wall art.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Skies5394@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Payola by any other name.

The more things change the more they stay the same.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Muh-muh-muh myyyyy payola!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is payola in the modern age. If a record company gives enough money to Spotify, they'll promote the hell out of it and guarantee it's a hit. So the record labels with the most money are the only ones that can make serious money.

Does Spotify disclose that this is paid promotional content in the app?

[–] Metal0130@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It's shown right there in the thumbnail. The text reads "Sponsored recommendation". After some initial conditioning, it seems easy to ignore it after a while, just like the first few Google results or other ads seen across the web.

[–] theothermatt_b@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tidal crew. We don't have podcasts either. It's nice.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Tidal is way nicer than Spotify. No bullshit promos for right-wing dipshit podcasts or shitty playlist payola schemes. It's like what Spotify originally claimed to be; an agnostic platform for streaming music.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I switched to Tidal over a year ago. I thought I would miss SOMETHING about Spotify after 1 year but there's nothing. The curated playlists are better, my recommended tracks are better, the UI is cleaner and easier to navigate. I actually learn about new genres and musicians that I otherwise wouldn't have been exposed to. It's the best.

[–] airportline@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Spotify enshitification any%

[–] HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

If it's anything like any other social media site that that let's you pay to promote, they will do it once...

And then half ass it a second time...

Then they just tell you they are, but you won't see any more people listening to it.

[–] Copernican@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Do folks reminiscing of the good old days of physical media not remember how much label promotion media was packed with media? I have records where the sleeve is basically an order catalog for other artists on the label. I don't see Spotify promoting albums on a discover feed to really be that much different than the marketing old except adopted for a digital interface and streaming economic structure.

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Meh I moved back to the old trick where I torrent download bulk music and store it on my phone. No internet no problem.

[–] small44@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I never stopped

[–] null@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 year ago (14 children)

That sounds great in theory, but the thing I haven't been able to replace is seamless discovery.

[–] Misanthrope@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would have trouble finding new music without torrent sites. The trackers I use have a web of related artists at the bottom of the artist page.

The users add to the community through comments, uploads, suggestions, organizing, et cetera.

Using a tracker has helped me discover music that ain't even on Spotify. It's the tits!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I feel like such a boomer for doing this as well, but I've had precisely 0 issues when my internet goes down or signal gets weak. No buffering, no problem.

Been doing it since high school when I had the first-gen iPod Shuffle. Good times

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hate Spotify so much, but every other attempt I've made to move away failed.

I used tidal for a bit, but it seems to break frequently from any privacy tooling I would use. I know they give artist a better payout, but if you don't work with my privacy method, it's a non starter.

[–] Misanthrope@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just download or copy all the music/audio I want to have, and put that all on my phone. Then I listen to it anywhere, anytime.

500GB SDcard is <100$

[–] LavaPlanet@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, that's a great option, but then the artist who created the music gets definitely zero for their product. It's not like Spotify really pays fairly for the product, so it's become pretty similar. The money grabbing Spotify does sounds like it'll pump up business (making artists pay to promote) but I would be so hugely behind a streaming app that actually paid their artists fairly and promoted new unknown stuff, just because. The novelty alone!

[–] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Bandcamp maybe?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vrijgezelopkamers@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I switched to Qobuz. Mainly for sound quality, but they also pay artists more than ten times as much and they have pretty neat long read articles and deep dives, which is a way more satisfying way to discover new stuff. It's pretty great.

[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Another reason to just use local player. Just buy physical albums and rip them, buy the actual digital files (from eg Bandcamp) or if you can't afford it right now, I'm sure you can find the files floating around the internet. Just make sure to buy the physical album when you can afford it.

Artists will receive far more support from buying their music this way rather than through Spotify which pays artists very little and the algorithm is against mid and small size creators.

[–] StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You'll also get higher quality files. Spotify can't play CD quality music. Apple and Tidal make a massive deal about being able to play "high quality audio", but it's a lot less impressive when you find out they really just meant CD quality, which had been around for almost 30 years. A real 24 bit flac takes longer to download than to play. Real high quality audio will never be streamed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't have found like half the music I listen to now if I was only buying releases I already knew about.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tim1996@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Wtf im a paying costumer &@#)!!!

[–] Onii-Chan@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I'll stick to InnerTune. Got rid of Spotify over a month ago, don't miss it at all.

[–] Floey@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Never used Spotify. I have my own methods of finding new music and once I have something I want to listen to I usually just type "[artist] [album] full album" on YouTube and if it's not there (which is very rare) it's usually on Bandcamp or SoundCloud. I do pay artists though, I buy their music if I enjoy it and always make sure to see them if they are in town, I think it's healthier than a subscription service model.

[–] Muetzenman@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Oh, i remember the drake takeover from 5 years ago.

[–] Stuka@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Man, people here really overreact to artists paying money to promote their stuff.

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

People get mad that Steam shows them games. It's like loading up Netflix, seeing the list of movies, and yelling "look at all of these ads"!

[–] small44@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Streaming services was supposed to recommend stuffs based on listening or watching habbits not who pay the most

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Ah, yet another reason to never use their home page. YouTube music seems to be the only decent recommendation engine these days

Time to cancel Spotify then.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Spotify this week launched a new tool called Showcase that allows artists to promote their work directly in the streaming app’s revamped Home feed introduced earlier this year.

The new feature was announced earlier this year at Spotify’s Stream On event in LA, alongside a range of other growth and discovery tools for artists, like the full-screen recommendations known as “Marquee” and a new “Discovery Mode” tool that allows artists and their teams to identify songs they want prioritized on the streaming service.

The company says that Showcase is opening up to artists and their teams with U.S.-based billing with 1,000 or more monthly streams in the last 28 days in at least one of the target markets.

By default, Spotify says it will show the campaign to those who are likely to stream the release — a broad audience.

“While playlist pitching is an opportunity for artists to find new audiences and Marquee helps them make a splash for their new releases, today there are more moments than ever where promotion can drive impact.

Showcase gives them the ability to do just that: now artists can amplify a new release, give their catalog an encore, turn viral buzz into long-term fandom, and more – right at the moments that matter most and on the most visited place on Spotify: Home,” she added.


The original article contains 487 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 54%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Still@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I'm so glad I stopped updating the app, I am lucky to still have the recently played at the top of my home page and then daily mixes right below it, I have to scroll to see the nonsense

load more comments
view more: next ›