this post was submitted on 24 May 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

chapotraphouse

13541 readers
769 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

they've removed the part within the parentheses at some point since i took the sc because they're cowards

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

My favorite joke was when they included John Lennon on a list of communist dictators.


Rationalwiki is kind of cursed.

Other examples of human rights violation and crimes against humanity include include:

  • Cuba under Fidel Castro
  • North Korea
  • The German Democratic Republic and the StasiWikipedia
  • Yugoslavia Under Tito
  • Romania under Nicolae Ceaușescu

And the list goes on and on.

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I mean yeah it was started by angry Conservapedia posters, of course it's trash.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Then why are they socially progressive on most issues? And like, have the single best page on Gamergate on the whole internet?

This doesn't track.

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

It was mentioned on the most recent QAA. The founders were all former Conservapedia contributors who got put off/banned by Schlafly's creationism.

Gives me strong New Atheist vibes any time I wind up there, so I wasn't shocked.

[–] moondog@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah I thought it was a leftist memey wikipedia

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Not quiet leftist because their takes on AES countries and communism in general are really bad but definitely like, center-left and very definitely socially progressive.

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought it was made by a bunch of libs in response to Conservapedia?

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Per the last QAA they were all Conservapedia contributors.

[–] StellarTabi@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Citation? I always thought it was more a mix of the david pakmin and destiny types.

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Most recent QAA talks about it as a tangent.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Really? But that site hates Conservapedia, doesn't it?

[–] supafuzz@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

conservapedia has too much young earth creationism, that was the cause of the split

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

The flattery it does for a certain techbro apocalyptic sex pest cult based on Harry Potter fanfiction is also :sus-soviet: