this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
240 points (100.0% liked)

Android

17652 readers
55 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oof I think this service is only worth it if you have a family plan and everyone helping. That is how I personally make it reasonable in terms of pricing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] li10@feddit.uk 57 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I’m in the UK and it’s already too expensive imo.

Would be great if I could just pay for no ads YT without YT music.

In fairness, the amount of YT that I watch on TV/iPhone makes it worth the cost, but any increases and I’ll probably just cancel and watch less YT, which isn’t a bad thing.

Or maybe just look at getting one of those Turkish subscriptions for like £2/month

[–] ahto@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would subscribe in a heartbeat if I could get a cheaper subscription without youtube music.

[–] li10@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it’s just absolutely useless for me.

I’ve got a decent Sonos setup and use Tidal because the quality on YT music makes everything sound meh.

[–] Carter@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Indian family plan is £2 a month for 6 people.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] henfredemars@lemdro.id 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow! It was hardly worth it to begin with.

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.film 9 points 1 year ago

Feels like one of the best value subscriptions to me?

I use YouTube more than most streaming services and it helps support creators

[–] JesusRat@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can somewhat understand Hulu and Netflix raising prices because of video content licensing but Youtube Premium? Fucking stupid as hell.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 year ago

YouTube has also been increasing its ads for free.

[–] sunandair@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Youtube Vanced on my devices, Piped on my computers. gg saved you 13.99 a month

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NewPipe is also a good alternative if you want to cut Google off your data, it doesn't use accounts and instead subscriptions are kept locally on the device.

[–] zxo@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

I don't comment at all, so NewPipe gets most of the functionaloty I would ever want from YouTube. Plus, it also helps by not having personalized reccomendations to keep me stuck watching it.

[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I only use revanced because I consider picture in picture and playback with screen off a basic feature, and removing it to monetize inherently immoral.

The fact it comes with everything else is bonuses. I'd pay for those bonuses, but I won't if they try to cheat me beforehand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChrV@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

And SmartTube for TV

[–] tal@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I use yt-dlp to pull down YouTube videos, and have ad blockers on my web browser (I didn't actually realize that YouTube even had ads until what was apparently years until after they'd rolled out, was stunned when I used someone else's computer).

However, I would assume that if a significant chunk of people go that way and YouTube decides that they're losing out on sufficient ad revenue and/or profiling data doing this, that they're going to start blocking those. I would guess that they can make life unworkably difficult for any third-party clients connecting to their service if they put their minds to it.

YouTube probably doesn't care about SponsorBlock, because they aren't getting a piece of that money. Heck, they probably benefit if it encourages advertisers to go through YouTube rather than content creators on YouTube. But the profiling and the YouTube-displayed ads are probably something that they are going to care about, if push comes to shove and the impact on their bottom line is large enough.

And one more point -- I can believe that the Threadiverse could potentially displace Reddit. Usenet was distributed and was once the norm for Internet forums, and something like that could be the situation again.

But the bandwidth costs of videos are a lot higher than the bandwidth costs of forum text. I am not convinced that PeerTube or something like that will necessarily work at the scale of replacing YouTube. At the least, it's going to be a rather larger chunk of money that has to come from somewhere than is the situation with forums. Someone is going to have to be writing checks, at the end of the day. Maybe it doesn't have to be via watching ads or users getting profiled, but the money's gotta be coming out of someone's pocket.

YouTube also has some of its content creators putting material up to be paid. Reddit doesn't -- well, didn't, as it looks like now they're exploring that -- have that commercial model, where they try to pay people who create content. For YouTube content where the creator is doing it with the aim of generating income, any hypothetical YouTube replacement would need to generate money to cover not just bandwidth costs, but also paying content creators.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] a_spooky_specter@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Gripping tight onto my initial grandfathered price from Google play music. $8

[–] tapple@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How? I had the same plan and got an email saying they wouldn't honor the grandfathered plan and I was still being upped. I think they gave me an extra month or two at the lower rate and that was it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rastilin@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Objectively, Youtube Premium is the one streaming service that I actually use... with youtube dlp because actually I can't stand the interface at all anymore; but even so, I use it and I feel ok about paying for it.

[–] RixMixed@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Why do you have a subscription and use YouTube dlp, doesn’t that just download the video whether you have a subscription or not?

[–] krzschlss@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been sailing the last few years so far out, I can't see the land anymore. And kinda don't care about land anymore...

[–] UnrealRealityX@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean to tell me there is actual land? I thought we were in Waterworld?

[–] krzschlss@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, we have Waterworld. In HD. Ya... there is an island still, we call it Spotify on our boat. We couldn't do without our shanties... But we do have a sea cave ready tho, when those Privateers become greedy.

[–] chramies@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nebula has a lot of the better YT content and costs much less than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maniacal_gaff@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Am I the only one who isn't completely outraged by 50 cents per day?

[–] li10@feddit.uk 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In fairness, it’s not just 50 cents per day, it’s yet another streaming service that’s increasing prices.

And it’s all well and good saying “you don’t have to buy it”, but these streaming companies are starting to get aggressive with squeezing money out of people.

Google in particular is trying to crack down on ad blockers, and trying to force more ads at the same time.

[–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

There's a lot of fatigue going around with everyone trying to sell you on their subscription service, "it's only x cents a day" becomes much more annoying when every facit of life also apparently needs to cost you X cents

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not outraged at all. Just more perplexed as someone who doesn't pay for it, since increasing price doesn't incentivize me more to get it. Not sure why in terms of features it doesn't have something that might make it worth it for those who haven't bothered like return of YouTube dislikes and bringing back the ability to group channels together. Which really helps when you have an overactive channel that is putting out too much content and suppressing your smaller channels which leads you to unsubscribe from them.

Once they got rid of channel groupings was when I started using YouTube logged in less and less and now I use newpipe which does have channel groupings. Oh another thing is no control over stuff like youtube shorts. They really should give paid users an ability to block that off and auto convert short videos into normal videos so it isn't looping without video controls. Other than ads it just feels lacking in additional customization for what is called a premium service. Even control over thumbnails so it replaces them with a screen cap from the video should be provided for premium users. YouTube is such an obnoxious delivery system by default. Provide ability to block channels too.

[–] Botree@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Just as Gaben once said, piracy is almost always a service problem, not a pricing problem.

It's not that we can't afford it, we just don't like getting treated as cash cows and idiots. Give them an inch and they'll take a mile, and before you know it, everything will be locked behind paywalls.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What is the point of Youtube Premium anyway?

[–] nefarious@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It means the creators I enjoy actually get paid, whereas with adblock they don't get any ad revenue.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The creators will see jack shit of that price increase. It's all going into exec's pockets. The smart ones all have Patreon or other ways of monetising their content anyway.

[–] nefarious@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Sorry, I don't see what this has to do with my comment? I was answering the question "What is the point of Youtube Premium anyway?" and said nothing about the price increase.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

You may be surprised to hear that the revenue split on Premium is the same as the split on Ads: 55% of all Premium money goes directly to creators on a member viewership basis. Alphabet increasing the price of Premium does increase the money going to Youtube corporate, but the revenue structure is fundamentally designed so that creators also receive an equal raise.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

I can skip the middleman and pay the creators via Patreon or whatever, no?

load more comments (1 replies)

I've had premium for so long now that I forget youtube has ads and when my friends try and play anything I am shocked at how shitty the experience is.

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Block ads without having to use an AdBlocker, but like who doesn’t use an AdBlocker these days

On mobile it allows you to continue playing videos when you close the app

And a recent addition they’ve added to it for mobile is the ability to fucking queue videos

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

but like who doesn’t use an AdBlocker these days

Hard to do from a game console or Chromecast, which happen to be the two methods I use most often for watching YouTube.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Adblocker is part of internet security. Just using a regular search engine these days can be risky with the sponsored links that can lead to people going to the wrong site.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sabriy01@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Phones, tablets; Revanced Extended

Android TV; Smarttubenext

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] poudlardo@terefere.eu 7 points 1 year ago

I use smartTube ony my TV (with sponsorblock integrated), LibreTube and newPipe on my phone (no ads, and download included), and YouTube + adguard, sponsorblock, unhook, dislike button extensions on my Desktoo. With all that effort, i do not need paying for Youtube premium.

[–] biddy@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

Huh? The ad revenue it replaces can't be more than $1/month.

[–] Sendpicsofsandwiches@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does anyone actually use that crap to begin with?

[–] tapple@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

If you really use YT and YT Music enough, and have a family that does the same and pitches in on the cost, it makes sense. No ads without the fuss.

Any other situation, it's a lot more questionable if it's worth it.

[–] funchords@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

The annual subscription, which was introduced in January of 2022, goes to $139.99 in a $20 increase.

I literally renewed just two days ago, right under the wire!

[–] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

youtube-dlp is the solution!

[–] tal@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

yt-dlp. Just "yt" rather than "youtube".

youtube-dl is an ancestor program of yt-dlp.

[–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Definitely wasn't worth it before and now they want to increase prices? Yikes. Guess I'll keep using revanced forever then

load more comments
view more: next ›