this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
323 points (99.4% liked)

World News

48073 readers
1952 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DragonConsort@pawb.social 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

YES

Finally some sort of actual consequence for the malicious bullshit of the ultra wealthy. We take those Ws

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re never going to spend a second in jail. The swiss don’t have them in custody now and they probably never will. The rich only ever get punished if they harm other richer people.

[–] PortugalSpaceMoon@infosec.pub 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They got suspended sentences. The author of the article didn't do their research (probably an LLM anyway).

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I was thinking it would be something like that and was shocked when it wasn’t mentioned in the article. But it doesn’t matter. Switzerland was never going to get them. They didn’t show up to their court cases and were claiming that they weren’t a flight risk. If Switzerland asked for their extradition from Monaco I bet you a year of my salary that they would have conveniently left just before the extradition request goes through. What a coincidence.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Too bad it's only one instance. They can never stop the majority of these assholes, just pick away at the occasional examples in a futile effort to scare the rest of them and to behaving.

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Imagine being worth almost $50 billion and paying your staff basically slave wages.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

That's why they're worth that much. You can't hoard that much wealth and have empathy. They're mutually exclusive.

They sound like animals. Glad to see justice being done here.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

How's do you think they got to be worth that much in the first place

Don't have to imagine it. That's most companies too.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sounds like the Saudi royal family. Except they're not that poor.

[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Britain's richest family has got to be the royals, right? Some wacky paperwork might make it look like it's not that way, but i have to assume that that's the case unless an in depth investigation specifically proves that it ISN'T true.

[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Afaik rishi sunaks family is way richer than the royal family. You live in capitalism, not feudalism

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re the same picture.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Capitalism == neofeudalism

Just like

Paycheck-To-Paycheck == neoslavery

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The royals have actual huge tracts of tax free land though. That's why capitalists want their own fiefs.

[–] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why? The worlds richest people aren't royal, so why would the UKs richest person need to be?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The British monarchy does have a relatively unique position in having been atop one of the world's biggest economies for far longer uninterrupted than any other extant royal family. You'd expect them to have amassed more than other royals solely because they've had access to far more opportunities to do so. That doesn't necessarily mean that they'll have outpaced every other rich family in the UK, but I can see where the person above is coming from

I can see where they're coming from, sure. But assuming something with no proof doesn't make any sense, to me at least.

I just found it such an odd thing to make an assumption over.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good start. They are actually not the only ones in that area where rumors of similar treatment of employees are making the rounds.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if working conditions have improved recently after this. LOL.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Could be, if the neighbours did smart up.

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Rich family exploits their workers.. suprise, suprise. I wonder just how many others they've exploited.

Nasty scummy people who should be in prison.