257
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 65 points 5 days ago

This isn't just a danger due to physical concerns or growth stunting.

It wires these kids brains for a resource scarce life. Which makes them think short term only.

People always talk about why everyone's crashing out these days, this is why.

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 32 points 5 days ago

I grew up food insecure when I was very young, and you really don't get over it. It's been hard not to hoard food as an adult.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's generational too...

My mom had a very poor hillbilly childhood. My friends never understood why I have like 4-6 months worth of food in the pantry at all times instead of just buying as I eat.

Even in college when everyone was always broke, pantry just has to stay stocked. There always has to be a cushion.

I wouldn't really call that food hoarding though, but it's subjective

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 10 points 5 days ago

Keeping six months of food on hand is definitely hoarding.

But I get it.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

6 months is stretching it.

But the pantry and freezer stays full. Like zombie survival type rationing I could probably go 6 months. But that all stays good forever, whatever I use I just re-up and put it at the back and move it all up.

Beats having to do home canning like I had to help with growing up tho lol.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Is there a resource I can read more about this.

Sounds like me to a t

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

Here's a general article, but there's lots of academic studies available if you search:

https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/how-poverty-affects-the-brain-and-behavior

It doesn't just have to be when young, poverty fucks your brain up because for the vast majority of human evolution, if you were hungry or didn't have shelter, that was what you needed to focus on.

It's Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

If you don't know what that is, that's a good place to start. Then read up how the absence effects people.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Thank you. I'm going to take a few days to unwind before I take it all in but this looks like a solid overview. Its always better to be aware and conscious of this stuff.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

Oh for sure, the wealthy know all about this.

Despite everything they try to distract us with, it's a class war and only one side has the energy after surviving to fight it.

The more normal people aware of it, the more progressives get elected, and the better our chances of living in a functional society again.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 46 points 5 days ago

This makes me SO HAPPY!

-Christ Loving Republicans who have no problem with their Tax Dollars paying for Jeff Bezos new Yacht.

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 44 points 5 days ago

Richest country in the world...

Sure.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

Oh it is.

... It's just all in the top 0.1% and corporate coffers.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Yep. They didn't say anything about sharing those riches with anyone.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 37 points 5 days ago

BECAUSE OF CORPORATE FUCKING GREED.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Enabled by political corruption.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

Let's not pretend small business greed is blameless.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 31 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

There’s summer EBT, available nationwide for states that opt in, bringing eligible families $120 as a summer grocery benefit—which has been found to decrease by a third the number of households with children who sometimes went hungry. (But despite that, 14 states, including Georgia, Alabama, and Texas, have not opted in.)

State governments that would prefer children starve

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Mitch McConnell despite all his big talk and rat fuckery/snake-like dealings has the common sense to accept tons of federal funding for Kentucky as he rails against the federal government

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 26 points 5 days ago

This has always been the case. It's just that nobody cared/could do anything about it. Now, there's an effort to feed these kids, but if course the Republicans have to fight it.

[-] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

But we have alot of bombs, and big boats with bigger guns. Murica!

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Don't forget about republicans' efforts to sabotage any free meal programs they can. If parents get priced out of food because of corporate greed, you can't expect the state to pick up the tab, can you???

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

When this happened in the UK, a footballer had to shame the government into fixing it

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
257 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18042 readers
3077 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS