723
submitted 3 days ago by makeasnek@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HKPiax@lemmy.world 180 points 3 days ago

I’ve never seen something as unhinged as Project 2025. I mean it, it sounds like a shitty “evil plan” cooked on 4chan, but it’s fucking real. Insane.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 60 points 3 days ago

It’s not just real it’s their actual political strategy. This isn’t fringe shit, this is what they will do when they take office.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago

it sounds like a shitty “evil plan” cooked on 4chan

4chan has several porn and LGBT boards. this is on conservatism.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 36 points 3 days ago

Conservatives consume tons of porn. They just feel guilt about it afterwards.

[-] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago

It's like one of those idiots came up with this stupid idea and now none of the other morons can call this out because they would have to admit that they are watching porn.

Like the emperor's new clothes but in politics.

[-] redisdead@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

They feel guilty about it and lash out on other people to make themselves feel better about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

If we're talking about American politics in our lifetime, yeah this is tops. But it's not history's craziest politics by a long shot

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Hear that everyone, it could be worse

Thanks for the enlightening framing. When they’re rounding up people they don’t like we should tell them it’s ok, it’s been worse

Nobody fucking cares. This isn’t some academic exercise to rank crazy times. This is the very real political strategy of a party about to take power in the US. This view from nowhere shit is so exhausting.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

You mistake me: I think it's so bad people should leave if they can, or revolt en masse. I just also like talking about history.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 137 points 3 days ago

Project 2025 wants to:

  • Outlaw pornography
  • Outlaw abortion
  • Outlaw homosexuality
  • Eliminate all major checks on presidential power. Say goodbye to the system of checks and balances
  • Replace many federal workers with those who are loyal only to the president

www.defeatproject2025.org breaks it down by topic, also highly suggest John Oliver's segment on it

Well, they've already made progress on point 4

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago

Its a good thing Biden is president, we should vote for him again so he can continue to not stop these things from happening

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago
[-] Fades@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

And one! Texas and shit taking first steps by requiring state id verification.

That’s how they do things, just enough to get the foot in the door, move the goalposts and repeat

[-] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Dictatorship ftw

[-] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

Replace many federal workers with those who are loyal only to the president

This is the key point that actually makes all this possible. From the wiki

It proposes reclassifying tens of thousands of merit-based federal civil service workers as political appointees in order to replace them with loyal conservatives to further the objectives of the next Republican president.

"Tens of thousands". There is absolutely not enough young republicans in the nation to replace that many federal workers. The outcome if they fired them anyways would be orders of magnitude worse than the De-Ba'athification of Iraq. Its declaring class war on Northern Virginia and its a fight the GOP would lose.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 75 points 3 days ago

Delete terms that deprive of first amendment rights.

Bit of an oxymoron isn't it?

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

For fascists, freedom of speech equals saying slurs.

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

In this case, the law being freedom of speech, the protection being to say what they want and the binding being to prohibit others from curtailing that. Naturally, the push for inclusive language is part of a movement to curtail that freedom and needs to be reversed and pushed back against.

[-] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Without the oxy

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

That's called doublespeak

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 3 days ago

No because every conservative either doesn’t know about it or pretends it isn’t as bad as it is, which they rationalize by making sure not to look at it too closely.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 28 points 3 days ago

"It only hurts the people I don't like" and "I would be exempt from this".

I have no idea why any immigrant or Hispanic would want this. He's directly targeting all of them. There are no exceptions, there's no points you get. This is his stated platform

[-] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Devout Christianity is a common reason. Specifically, the kind that believes abortion is murder and is the number 1 topic that can supersede all others. If one candidate vows to outlaw it and the other vows to protect it, the conservative Christian brainwashing machine gets these out-groups to vote against all of their interests to "protect babies".

Taxes is another I hear. People actually beleive Republicans are fiscally responsible and going to help these out-groups, many of whom are lower middle class, get ahead by reducing tax. Ignore the part where reducing everyone's taxes increases everyone's gains, increasing everyone's budget, and therefore not actually increasing anyone's purchasing power because the market will adjust sales price higher.

Obviously, this works on the majority demographics too. But they're closer to the in-group than who you asked about

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

I never thought the leopard would eat my face!

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 15 points 3 days ago

But I was one of the good ones!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

I have a gay friend that loves Trump, I tried to explain this to him but he got mad at me

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Ok ok ok....the porn is going too far and we all know that you all will be the ones suffering..so you need to work on your blatant lies.. Your own president paid to sleep with a porn star for heaven's sake

[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

He's not our president anymore! Yet!

[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

I pray to you Jeebus, Buddha, Allah, Satan, Giant sketti monster....PLZ HALP. I mean your own as in the Republican party's president.. sorry for the funky wording teddy brosavelt

[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 35 points 3 days ago

Literally just yesterday I posted about it in my family’s political group chat and my older sister said, and I quote:

“even though I lean left, I'm actually glad that conservatives have a playbook! Why? because Trump's first term presidential transition (2017) was totally bungled... he needs a list of people that he can appoint from, so that these agencies don't just fall apart… Don't kid yourself, Biden's team and Obama's team and the democrats overall definitely have their own playbook and their list of potential appointees. They just don't have to crowdsource theirs!”

cue insane Charlie Kelly screams

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Narrator: She did not actually lean left, but instead very far right.

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

She just likes weed.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 27 points 3 days ago

my family’s political group chat

[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

One member got upset that we were discussing politics in the family group chat so much in 2020 (read: we were bashing Donald Trump and his fucking idiocy too much) and insisted we move the conversation elsewhere

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

We are so fucked

[-] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago

The US ruling class has been trying to do all of these things for decades. I’ve been treated like I’m insane for calling this out since well before Project 2025 was formulated. It’s honestly frustrating to see the amount of people finally coming around now that all their ducks are in a row and a second Trump term is looking more and more certain every day. Biden’s been literally doing Republican policies for his entire presidency and we haven’t heard a fucking peep from the liberal “activists” in my area about it.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

but biden said umm. i can't tell the difference /s

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago

already happening

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
723 points (96.5% liked)

Memes

44134 readers
1989 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS